can u do my labs?
sultan994
Science Laboratory Report Grading Framework Developed by Dr. Peter Jeschofnig
TOTAL POINTS OUT OF 100 POSSIBLE POINTS ______
Unsatisfactory
Borderline
Satisfactory
Excellent
Score
Title Page
Total = 5 pts.
Missing more than two
items, title, or names.
0-2 points
Contains title and all
names; but two items are
missing.
3 point
Contains tile and names,
but one item is missing.
4 points
Contains title, author and
partners’ names, course
name, experiment number;
and report dates.
5 points
Theory/purpose
Total =10 pts.
No Theory, or incomplete
theory and purpose/or
incomplete theory and
purpose .
0-3 points
Includes adequate theory and purpose .
5 points
Contains theory and
purpose , but some result
details are missing.
8 points
Contains clear purpose
statement and complete
theory .
10 points
Equipment
Used
Total =10 pts.
Incomplete or missing
equipment(s) used .
0-4 points
Clearly states the
equipment(s) used
10 points
Procedures
Total =10 pts.
Unclear or missing
instructions. Most steps
are missing, income-
plete, disorganized, or not
sequential.
0-4 points
Vague instructions.
Some steps missing, not
well organized, or not
fully sequential.
6 points
Includes a clear set of
instructions. A few steps
are missing. Reasonably
well organized.
8 points
In clear, concise sentences
with step-by-step format.
Experiment can be
replicated. Includes
materials in methods..
10 points
Data/
Observations
Total =25 pts.
Data is missing,
incomplete, inaccurate, or
has material defects;
No data tables when
appropriate. Missing
graphs. Most or all
observations missing.
Incomplete or no
calculations. Few
questions answered.
0-12 points
Data presented, but
poorly organized,
inaccurate, or missing.
Graphs are inaccurate in
data display, incorrectly
or not labeled. Poor or
incomplete observations
Poor or incomplete
calculations. Some
questions answered.
16 points
Data presented clearly and
neatly. Most charts, tables,
diagrams, and graphs
labeled and accurate;
detailed and reasonably
accurate observations.
Most calculations shown
and are correct. Most
questions answered.
20 points
Data presented clearly and
neatly. All charts, tables,
diagrams, and graphs
labeled and accurate.
Appropriate type of
graphing chosen. Detailed
and accurate observations.
Calculations shown and
are correct. All questions
correctly answered.
25 points
Analysis
Total =20 pts.
Explanation of data is
missing, inaccurate, or
not expressed in complete
sentences. Error analysis
incomplete, missing or
wrong.
0-8 points
Incomplete description
of data; 3 or more
important observations
are missing. Error
analysis is incomplete or
only partially correct.
12 points
Results stated correctly in
complete sentences. No
more than 1 or 2 important
observations are missing.
Error analysis present and
correct.
15 points
Complete description of
what occurred stated in
complete sentences. Data
is used accurately in
reporting/analyzing the
results. Error analysis
present and correct.
20 points
Conclusions
Total =20 pts.
Conclusion is missing or
does not fully explain the
objectives of the lab.
Relevant vocabulary
missing. No practical
application given.
Discussion of scientific
principle missing. Only 1-
2 sentences.
0-8 points
Conclusion explains the
objective, but data is not
used accurately to
support it. Only 2-3
sentences.
12 points
Adequate paragraph of
explanation that includes
supporting evidence with
data, but missing “big
picture”, scientific error,
and/or additional inquiry
suggestions. Good
vocabulary use. Only 4-5
sentences.
15 points
Well written and logical
paragraph of explanation
supported by data that
addresses the objectives,
scientific principles, and
ends with the ‘big picture.
Includes scientific error
and pro-poses inquiry for
un-answered questions
6+ sentences.
20 points