Managing recruitment and selection
oarvoqo2g01Week 4 Assignment Rubric
CATEGORY |
EXCELLENT – above expectations |
GOOD – met expectations |
FAIR – below expectations |
POOR – significantly below expectations or missing |
SCORE |
Part I: Challenges and Strategies for Recruitment and Selection Analysis of challenges related to recruitment and selection. (15 points possible)
|
The analysis shows depth, breadth, and clarity in critical thinking when addressing more than six recruitment and six selection challenges. (14–15 points)
|
The analysis fully addresses six recruitment and six selection challenges. (13 points)
|
The analysis lacks depth, breadth, or clarity in critical thinking when addressing the six recruitment and six selection challenges. (12 points) |
The analysis does not address (zero points) or poorly addresses six recruitment and six selection challenges. (0–11points)
|
|
Recommendations for strategic approaches to address the challenges related to recruitment and selection. (20 points possible) |
The recommendation of strategic approaches shows depth, breadth, and clarity in critical thinking when addressing the challenges related to recruitment and selection. (18–20 points)
|
The recommendations of strategic approaches fully addresses the challenges related to recruitment and selection. (16–17 points)
|
The recommendations of strategic approaches lack depth, breadth, or clarity in critical thinking when addressing challenges related to recruitment and selection. (14–15 points) |
The recommendations of strategic approaches do not address (zero points) or poorly address the challenges related to recruitment and selection. (0–13 points)
|
|
Evaluation of recruitment sources and selection methods. (15 points possible) |
The evaluation of recruitment sources and selection methods shows depth, breadth, and clarity in critical thinking when addressing their efficiency and effectiveness. (14–15 points)
|
The evaluation of recruitment sources and selection methods fully addresses their efficiency and effectiveness. (13 points) |
The evaluation of recruitment sources and selection methods lacks depth, breadth, and clarity in critical thinking when addressing their efficiency and effectiveness. (12 points) |
The evaluation of recruitment sources and selection methods does not address (zero points) or poorly addresses their efficiency and effectiveness. (0–11 points)
|
|
Part II: Recruitment and Selection Plans Objectives for developing an effective recruitment process. (5 points possible) |
Critical thinking is shown in the development of more than three key objectives for developing an effective recruitment process. The objectives are specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-oriented. (5 points) |
The three key objectives effectively address the recruitment process. (4 points) |
Critical thinking is lacking in the development of more than three key objectives for developing an effective recruitment process. (3 points) |
The objectives are missing (zero points) or poorly address the recruitment process. (0–2 points) |
|
Recruitment process. (10 points possible) |
The explanation of the recruitment process shows depth, breadth, and clarity in critical thinking. (9–10 points) |
The explanation fully addresses the recruitment process. (8 points) |
The explanation of the recruitment process lacks depth, breadth, and clarity in critical thinking. (7 points) |
The explanation is missing (zero points) or poorly addresses the recruitment process. (0–6 points) |
|
Objectives for developing an effective selection process. (5 points possible) |
Critical thinking is shown in the development of more than three key objectives for developing an effective selection process. The objectives are specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-oriented. (5 points)
|
The three key objectives effectively address the selection process. (4 points) |
Critical thinking is lacking in the development of more than three key objectives for developing an effective selection process. (3 points)
|
The objectives are missing (zero points) or poorly address the selection process. (0–2 points) |
|
Selection Process (10 points possible) |
The explanation of the selection process shows depth, breadth, and clarity in critical thinking. (9–10 points) |
The explanation fully addresses the selection process. (8 points) |
The explanation of the selection process lacks depth, breadth, and clarity in critical thinking. (7 points) |
The explanation is missing (zero points) or poorly addresses the selection process. (0–6 points) |
|
Writing (20 points possible)
|
The paper is well organized, uses scholarly tone, contains original writing and proper paraphrasing, follows APA style, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with graduate level writing style. The work is supported by the Learning Resources and more than three additional scholarly sources. The paper is 9–12 pages plus a title and a reference page. (18–20 points) |
The paper is mostly consistent with graduate level writing style and may have some spelling, APA, and writing errors. The work is supported by the Learning Resources and at least three additional scholarly sources. The paper is 9–12 pages plus a title and a reference page. (16–17 points)
|
The paper is somewhat consistent with graduate level writing style and may have some spelling, APA, and writing errors. The work is supported by the Learning Resources and less than three additional scholarly sources. The paper is not 9–12 pages plus a title and a reference page. (14–15 points) |
The paper is well below graduate level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and writing, or shows heavy reliance on quoting. The work is not supported by the Learning Resources or additional scholarly sources. The paper is not 9–12 pages plus a title and a reference page. (0–13 points)
|
|
Instructor comments: |
|
||||
Total Score (100 possible points): |
points |
© 2015 Laureate Education, Inc. Page 2 of 2