Research report
Nasser22
1
GUIDELINES FOR THE RESEARCH PROJECT (400) POINTS
The topic I chose is about Outsourcing to Southeast Asia
For References please use Scholarly Journals (Peer Reviewed)
Research Paper Rubric
Team Names:________________________________________________________________Class:_____________________Score:____/400
Category
|
Exceeds Standards
|
Meets Standards
|
Nearly Meets Standard
|
Below Standard
|
Score |
Title Page (10 points max)
|
Title, Student name, Professor name, Course & Section, Date, Neatness
|
At least 4 of the standards, must have student name |
At least 3 of the standards, must have student names |
Evidence of 2 and must include student names. |
|
Thesis Statement (20 points max)
|
Clearly and concisely states the purpose of the paper in a single sentence; Engaging & Thought provoking
|
Clearly states the purpose of the paper in a single sentence |
Generally states the purpose of the paper; Somewhat clear |
Incomplete or unfocused |
|
Introduction/Executive Summary (40 points max)
|
The introduction is engaging, states the main topic and previews the structure of the paper |
The introduction states the main topic and previews the structure of the paper |
The introduction states the main topic but does not adequately preview the structure of the paper. |
There is no clear introduction or main topic and the structure of the paper is missing. |
|
Body of Paper (20 points max)
|
Each paragraph has thoughtful supporting detail sentences that develop the main idea.
|
Most paragraphs have sufficient supporting detail sentences that develop the main idea. |
Several paragraphs lacks supporting detail sentences |
Many paragraphs fail to develop the main idea. |
|
Structural Development of Ideas (240 points max)
|
The paper demonstrates logical and subtle sequencing of ideas through well-developed paragraphs. Transitions are used to enhance readability.
|
The paragraph development is present but not perfected. Logical presentation of ideas. |
Logical organization of ideas although not fully developed. |
Very little evidence of structure or organization to the paper. |
|
Conclusion/Recommendation (40 points max)
|
The conclusion is engaging and restates the thesis. |
The conclusion simply restates the thesis but is not compelling |
The conclusion does not adequately restate the thesis. |
Incomplete and or unfocused. |
|
Mechanics/Usage (20 points max) |
No errors in punctuation, capitalization, spelling, structure and word usage. |
Almost no errors in key spelling and grammar, structure or word usage. |
Many errors are evident. |
Numerous errors are evident and distracting to the paper. |
|
Citation/Bibliography (10points max)
|
All cited works, both text and visual, are done in the correct format with no errors.
|
Some inconsistencies |
Few cited works are done in the correct format |
Completely absent of correct format. |
|