2016mlc703rubric.pdf

MLC703   T2  2016  Assignment  Rubric      

Performance   Indicators  

  Question   1A  

  BELOW  MINIMUM   STANDARD  

  MEETS  STANDARD  

  EXCEEDS  STANDARD  

  Low  Fail  (LN)   0-­‐29%  

Fail  (N)  

30-­‐49%   Unsatisfactory  

Pass  (P)  

50-­‐59%   Satisfactory  

Credit  (C)  

60-­‐69%   Good  

Distinction   (D)  

70-­‐79%   Very  good  

High  Distinction   (HD)  

80-­‐100%   Exemplary  

    Identification    of   the  relevant   assessable   income   issues  

             

/2  

Failed  to  identify  any   issues     No  analysis  of  issues  

  Did  not  address   question  

Failed  to  identify   most  issues  

Insufficient   analysis  of   issues     Failed  to  adequately   address  question  

identified   most  key   issues  

Limited  analysis  of   the  issues     Some  issues  dealt   with  

Identified   most  key   issues  

Generally   identified   the  issues  accurately     Advice  generally   clear   and  accurate  

Identified   most  key   issues   Identification   of   Issues  Mostly   Accurate  

Accurate  and  clear   advice  

Identified   all  relevant   issues  

Identification   of   issues  accurate     Clear,  accurate  and   relevant  advice  

        Researched   and   applied   the   law   correctly  

                   

/6  

  No   evidence   of   research   of   the   problem  

  Seriously   incorrect   application   of  the  law   to  the  facts  

  Limited  evidence  of   research  of  the   problem  

  Lacks  evidence  of   legal  knowledge       Incorrect   application   of  the  law  to  the  facts  

  Some  important   resources   overlooked  

  Further  analysis  and   discussion   required  to   justify  application   of   the  law  to  the  facts  

  Competently   researched       Good  application   of   the  law  to  the  facts  

  Well  researched       Very  good  application   of  the  law  to  the   facts.  

  Thoroughly   researched       Excellent   application   of  the  law  to  the  facts  

Citing  legislation   and  case   authority  

 

   

/2  

  No  citation  of   legislation   or  cases  

  Inadequate   citation  of   sources  

Several  missing,   incomplete   or   incorrect   citations  

  Some  missing  or   incomplete   citations  

Authorities   and   sources  generally   correctly  cited  

Complete   and   accurate  citation  of   authorities  

Overall          

/10  

 

   

Performance   Indicators  

  Question   1B  

  BELOW  MINIMUM   STANDARD  

  MEETS  STANDARD  

  EXCEEDS  STANDARD  

  Low  Fail  (LN)   0-­‐29%  

Fail  (N)  

30-­‐49%   Unsatisfactory  

Pass  (P)  

50-­‐59%   Satisfactory  

Credit  (C)  

60-­‐69%   Good  

Distinction   (D)  

70-­‐79%   Very  good  

High  Distinction   (HD)  

80-­‐100%   Exemplary  

      Identification    of   key  CGT  issues:  

             

/6  

Failed  to  identify  any   issues     No  analysis  of  issues  

  Did  not  address   question  

Failed  to  identify   most  issues  

Insufficient   analysis  of   issues     Failed  to  adequately   address  question  

identified   most  key   issues  

Limited  analysis  of   the  issues     Some  issues  dealt   with  

Identified   most  key   issues  

Generally   identified   the  issues  accurately     Advice  generally   clear   and  accurate  

Identified   most  key   issues   Identification   of   Issues  Mostly   Accurate  

Accurate  and  clear   advice  

Identified   all  relevant   issues  

Identification   of   issues  accurate     Clear,  accurate  and   relevant  advice  

        Researched   and   apply  law   correctly   including   calculations  

                   

/18  

No   evidence   of   research   of   the   problem     Seriously   incorrect   application   of  the  law   to  the  facts  

  Calculations   substantially   incorrect  

Limited  evidence  of   research  of  the   problem  

  Lacks  evidence  of   legal  knowledge       Incorrect   application   of  the  law  to  the  facts  

  Incorrect   calculations   of  capital  gains  

  Some  important   resources   overlooked     Further  analysis  and   discussion   required  to   justify  application   of   the  law  to  the  facts   Some   errors/omissions  in   calculation   of  capital   gains  

  Competently   researched  

  Good  application   of   the  law  to  the  facts  

  Some   errors/omissions  in   calculation   of  capital   gains  

  Well  researched  

  Very  good  application   of  the  law  to  the   facts.  

  Very  good  calculation   of  capital  gains  

  Thoroughly   researched  

  Excellent   application   of  the  law  to  the  facts       Correct  calculation   of   capital  gains  

Citing  legislation   and  case   authority  

  /6  

No  citation  of   legislation   or  cases  

Inadequate   citation  of   sources  

Several  missing,   incomplete   or   incorrect   citations  

Some  missing  or   incomplete   citations  

Authorities   and   sources  generally   correctly  cited  

Complete   and   accurate  citation  of   authorities  

Overall      

/30  

 

    Performance   Indicators  

  Question   2  

  BELOW  MINIMUM   STANDARD  

  MEETS  STANDARD  

  EXCEEDS  STANDARD  

      Fail  (N)   0-­‐49%  

Unsatisfactory  

  Pass  (P)  

50-­‐59%   Satisfactory  

  Credit  (C)  

60-­‐69%   Good  

  Distinction   (D)  

70-­‐79%   Very  good  

  High  Distinction   (HD)  

80-­‐100%   Exemplary  

    Critical  Thinking   and  Analysis  

           

/18  

   Insufficient   analysis  of   topic  

  Main  arguments   are   either  not  made  or   unsound  

  Little  analysis  of   issues     Main  arguments   are   unclear  or   underdeveloped,  or   not  well  supported.  

  Some  analysis  of   issues  

  Some  arguments   may   lack  a  critical  analysis  

Good  analysis.   Arguments   developed     supported     Well  argued,   demonstrates    some   critical  evaluations.  

A  thorough   critical   analysis  of  the  issues   raised     Persuasively   argued,   demonstrating    critical   evaluation.  

            Research  

                         

/14  

    Limited  research  

      Key  research  missing  

  Some  important   resources   overlooked  

    Limited  discussion   of   key  resources  

      Further  analysis  and   discussion   required  to   justify  arguments  

  Competently   researched  

Good  use  of  sources   to  support   arguments,   but   further  identification   and  application   of   important   resources   required     Good  discussion   of   key  issues  arising   from  question  

  Well  researched    

    Appropriate   use   of   sources   to   support   arguments  

    Very  good  discussion   of  issues  with  good   reference   to  quality   materials  

  Thoroughly   researched  

    Effective  use  of   sources  to  support   argument  

    Sources  accurately   and  appropriately   used  

Communication   and  Presentation  

  /8    

Disorganised   structure   and  

Some  organisation   but  structure   and  

Generally   organised   and  coherent  

Generally   well   presented  

Assignment   well   presented   with  

Did  not  conform   with  instructions  

Generally   conformed   with  instructions  

Generally   conformed   with   instructions  

  Logical  Structure  

Well  structured   with  clear  analysis  

Overall      

/40   Total  

/80