week-5
nikkum
Rubric Detail
Exemplary Proficient NeedsImprovement Not Evident
Comprehension 2.4 (20%) Develops an initial post with an organized, clear point of view or idea using rich and significant detail
2.16 (18%) Develops an initial post with a point of view or idea using appropriate detail
1.68 (14%) Develops an initial post with a point of view or idea but with some gaps in organization and detail
0 (0%) Does not develop an initial post with an organized point of view or idea
Timeliness 1.2 (10%) N/A
1.2 (10%) Submits initial post on time
.84 (7%) Submits initial post one day late
0 (0%) Submits initial post two or more days late
Engagement 2.4 (20%) Provides relevant and meaningful response posts with clarifying explanation and detail
2.16 (18%) Provides relevant response posts with some explanation and detail
1.68 (14%) Provides somewhat relevant response posts with some explanation and detail
0 (0%) Provides response posts that are generic with little explanation or detail
Critical Thinking
3.6 (30%) Draws insightful conclusions that are thoroughly defended with evidence and examples
3.24 (27%) Draws informed conclusions that are justified with evidence
2.52 (21%) Draws logical conclusions
0 (0%) Does not draw logical conclusions
Writing 2.4 (20%) 2.16 (18%) 1.68 (14%) 0 (0%)
A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Name: Discussion Rubric: Graduate ExitExit
Grid View List View
Writing (Mechanics)
2.4 (20%) Initial post and responses are easily understood, clear, and concise using proper citation methods where applicable with no errors in citations
2.16 (18%) Initial post and responses are easily understood using proper citation methods where applicable with few errors in citations
1.68 (14%) Initial post and responses are understandable using proper citation methods where applicable with a number of errors in citations
0 (0%) Initial post and responses are not understandable and do not use proper citation methods where applicable
Name:Discussion Rubric: Graduate ExitExit