short essay 4 geopolitics


From the scientific evidence that has been produced over the last two decades regarding global warming, it is no longer a debate anymore but an undeniable fact. That said, with the multiple threats to cities like Miami, New York and entire nations like China and the Netherlands from just one negative aspect of global warming, that of seal level rise, why do some remain in denial? Climate denialists, as they have been termed, couch their arguments that any attempt to attack the problem would cause massive economic hardship and furthermore be unfair to developing nations that depend on fossil fuels for power. Do you agree with this line of thinking or do you think the problem of global warming is a problem that can and must be solved? Be sure to use examples to support your key points.

  • 13 days ago
  • 8

Purchase the answer to view it

  • attachment