Prof Xaiver
Jenny35Judge Richard Posner of the 7th Circuit was quoted as saying: "And on another note about academia and practical law, I see absolutely no value to a judge of spending decades, years, months, weeks, day, hours, minutes, or seconds studying the Constitution, the history of its enactment, its amendments, and its implementation (across the centuries—well, just a little more than two centuries, and of course less for many of the amendments). Eighteenth-century guys, however smart, could not foresee the culture, technology, etc., of the 21st century. Which means that the original Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the post–Civil War amendments (including the 14th), do not speak to today."
1) Do you agree with Judge Posner that there is no value in studying the U.S. Constitution? Explain your position.
NO LESS THAN 300 WORDS
References
- 6 years ago
- 25
Purchase the answer to view it
- THEIMPORTANCEOFTHECONSTITUTION.edited.docx
- A Paper about the philosophy
- 1. What is the difference between Horizontal and Vertical Equity? 2. What is the difference between Static and Dynamic Forecasting?
- WK 2 - CC Ch 2
- can u help
- DB 1 Forensic accountants and fraud examiners provide support for accusations of fraud. To be effective, they must understand the difference between fraud and abuse, and must understand the legal concept of fraud, as well as elements of fraud. Addition
- a philosophy paper
- Devising and Justifying an Active Directory Disaster Recovery Plan
- Retail Management Assignment 2
- Week 7 Discussion BUS 302
- Compare 3