Presentation will be assessed on the extent and quality to which it meets each

of the following criteria.

1. A description and discussion of the operation of the operation of diverse and complex

government and non-government project contractual arrangements relevant to a range of

managed services, ICT, and build agreements? (20%)

2. An explanation of common arguments using logic, persuasion and influence factors as

commonly applied to conflicting and/or competing stakeholder agendas? (20%)

3. Critical analysis of methods of project negotiation, conflict management, and stakeholder

engagement across projects consisting of differing technology standards and asset lifecycles?


4. Appropriate and well structured, concise and clear expression of project management

arguments in response to the assessment task? (5%)

5. A clear flow of thought throughout the presentation with a clear purpose described in the

introduction and a comprehensive conclusion? (5%)

6. A critical review and integration of relevant academic and professional literature (cited at least

twenty (20) times)? (10%)

7. Clarity of expression, grammar and spelling? (5%)

Harvard Referencing Guide? (5%)

9. Appropriate presentation format and presented within slide and note/script limit: 10 to 20 slides

& notes/script? (10%)

  • Posted: 3 months ago
  • Due: 
  • Budget: $45
Answers 1

Purchase the answer to view it