paper

profilePeppaP
  1. Read Oracle V. Google by Parloff.
  2. Conduct further research of the case and use the IRAC method to conduct a case analysis.
  3. State the Issue
    • What is the legal question that, when answered, determines the legal result of the case? What are the parties disputing and what do they want the court to decide?
    • The issue should be stated in the form of a question in a specific, rather than a general form.
    • If there is more than one issue to address, then you must write a separate IRAC analysis for each issue.
    • 1. Identify the Rule
    • What law or test applies to the issue?
    • The rule should be stated as a general principle and not a conclusion to the particular case.

    • 2. Conduct an Analysis
    • Apply the rule to the facts of the case. What are the relevant facts given the rule of the law?
    • Use the facts to explain how the rule leads to the conclusion. How does the court interpret the rule?
    • Discuss both sides to the case.

    • 3. State the Conclusion
    • The conclusion should be stated in one or two sentences. The rationale should not be longer than a paragraph.
    • Do you agree with the court's rulings thus far? Explain your answer.

    • 4. Answer the following questions.
    • If you were the judge in this case, how would you rule? Provide the rationale for your answer.
    • What makes this case significant?
    • 4 years ago
    • 18
    Answer(2)

    Purchase the answer to view it

    blurred-text
    NOT RATED

    Purchase the answer to view it

    blurred-text
    NOT RATED
    • attachment
      order_139654_369002.doc