Ethics in Action
raybetts1
Imagine that you are the owner of a small jewelry store. A customer leaves a family heirloom with you for cleaning. By mistake, a salesperson sells the ring to another customer. How would you handle the situation? Now, imagine that you were the customer who purchased the ring for your fiancé. When the owner calls you to tell you about the situation, what do you do?
In response to your peers, consider your peers’ response. If they disagree with your response, consider the factual assumptions they have made which form the foundation of their opinion. Can you challenge those assumptions while furthering your discussion? If your responses are similar, consider posing a hypothetical question to test your peer’s conclusions.
Regardless of whether you are an attorney arguing in court or a business stakeholder pitching to shareholders or a potential client, adding support for your argument from appropriate resources strengthens your content. For this discussion board, be sure to include a citation to an appropriate source that supports the point you are making.
4 days ago
10
Purchase the answer to view it
ETHICSANDLAW.docx- Ethics.pdf
- Tutor Cyrus Ken
- Dr. Rachael Malk
- Musyokiones
- Dr. Diana_Ashley
- Michelle GoodMan
- Dr Michelle Maya
- Quality Assignments
- American Tutor
- Discount Ans
- Discount Assign
- Nightingale
- ProCastrol01
- Dr shamille Clara
- HomeMarket_Tutor
- juliusmu33
- Creative Geek
- Miss Angelina
- Teacher A+ Work
- michael smith
- Paula Hog
- Yourstar
- Ashliey Writer
- wizard kim
- RihAN_Mendoza
- queruboh
- MEERAB NAEEM
- Sasha Spencer
- Brilliant Geek
- Emily Michael
- quality work for all
- HOMWORK_WRITER
- Dr. Michelle_KM
- Brainy Brian
- prof avril
- Urgent Tutor
- Cotton Candy
- ProfRubbs
- Topanswers
- prof bradley
- Noor427726
- WIZARD_KIM
- Flexible Tutor
- Amanda Smith
- PROF_TOMMY
- Eva Green
- Prof.MacQueen
- Dr R Judy Mark
- EssaySupremo
- Agher Editor
- Catherine Owens
- Angelina May
- Elprofessori
- Stano 001
- Lisa-Randall
- university work
- Rima Makenzie
- MathStats Acer
- Ultimate GEEK
- RELIABLE PAPERS
- Dr.Michelle_Prof
- Michelle Owens
- Terry Roberts
- PapersGuru
- FINEST TUTOR
- Taylor Rodman
- PROF_ALISTER
- Wendy Lewis
- Beaverly
- Coleen Anderson
- Dr. Beneve
- Splendid Tutor
- brilliant answers
- Rey writer
- ConsultThanos
- Prof Hangoi
- kim woods
- Phd christine
- Goodwriter
- Talentedtutor
- Prof. Johnstar
- A+GRADE HELPER
- Nursing_Miss
- Dr_Amal
- Tutor-Parrot
- Proff work phd
- Essay-Shark-JW25
- smart-tutor
- DrNicNgao
- Prof. Bierce
- Jessica Luis
- EMMA_WRITER
- MISS MLUCK
- Tutor-Cahun
- hassan_0102
- ansRohan
- Prof Nato(PhD)
- ChrisProf
- Martin Writer
- Ranchoddas Chanchad PhD
- Sally Sutton
- Rose Wilson
- Prof.Clintonnjer
- Tom Kirk
- Eznah 001
- ProfKangaarray
- williamoketch-91
- English draft
- Psychology Discussion post 400 words Turnitin and Grammarly warning
- Case study Phd. Victor
- Argumentative Essay
- criminal and justice paper ---- at least 2 pages
- Supply Chain Management Home work
- ASAP DO LIT REVIEW FOR 3 SOURCES
- Economics of Health Care
- HCA322: Assignment 3
- Classroom Management Models
Liebeck v. McDonald’s case.
Review the resources regarding the Liebeck v. McDonald’s case. Think about what you learned about torts in this unit. If you were a member of the jury, would you have decided for Liebeck …
24 days agoLambert v. Barron
· What are the most important facts that support Lambert’s position that a contract existed?
· What are the most important facts that support Barron’s position that a contract did not …
18 days agoWhat Function of Law is Most Important?
NOT RATEDConsidering the functions of law as defined in the assigned reading for this unit:
- Peacekeeping
- Checking government power and promoting personal freedom
- Facilitating planning and the …
10 months agoResolution of private disputes
NOT RATEDyou are learning about the resolution of private disputes and what happens during the discovery phase of litigation. Imagine that you are a project manager at a construction company and your company …
10 months agoUnit 2 DB: Ethical Issues and Document Destruction in Discovery
NOT RATEDIn Unit 2, you are learning about the resolution of private disputes and what happens during the discovery phase of litigation. Imagine that you are a project manager at a construction …
9 months agoUnit 4 DB: Liebeck v. McDonalds (The “Hot Coffee” Case)
NOT RATED400 words
Review the resources regarding the Liebeck v. McDonald’s case. Think about what you learned about torts in this unit. If you were a member of the jury, would you have decided …
9 months agoLiebeck vs McDonald’s
NOT RATEDReview the resources regarding the Liebeck v. McDonald’scase. Think about what you learned about torts in this unit. If you were a member of the jury, would you have decided for Liebeck or for …
9 months agoUnit 6 DB: Consideration “Fails”
NOT RATED300-350 words
There are certain promises that are not considered consideration.
- As a business owner or stakeholder, how can you ensure that your contracts are enforceable?
- Think back to …
9 months agoUnit 7 DB: Ethics in Action
NOT RATED350-400 words
Imagine that you are the owner of a small jewelry store. A customer leaves a family heirloom with you for cleaning. By mistake, a salesperson sells the ring to another customer. …
8 months ago
