Environmental Science Discussion 3
CmodAlthough it was projected to cause the loss of more than 30,000 jobs in the Pacific Northwest's rural communities, logging was greatly reduced in 1994 to protect the northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina). After implementing the plan, jobs were lost. Debate exists, however, as to whether the recovery plan was wholly responsible for the loss of jobs. In addition, the owl population continued to decline.
Based on the information provided, respond to these questions in your posting:
- In your opinion, was the loss of jobs worth the attempt to save the owl population, even though it seems to have been unsuccessful? Justify your rationale.
- Do you believe it is possible to have a healthy environment and a healthy economy? Justify your rationale.
- If you believe it is possible to have both, suggest one way this could be feasible.
- If you don’t believe it is possible to have both, suggest one factor that would need to change to foster a healthy environment and a healthy economy.
- Be sure to support your answers with specifics and examples.
- 3 years ago
- 6
Answer(1)
Purchase the answer to view it
- EnvironmentalScience.edited.docx
- TurnitinReport.pdf
other Questions(10)
- Business assignment
- For Katetutor
- APPLE ANALYSIS
- aviation design safety class
- What is the probability that 20 or more customers chose the leading brand?
- Crime unit 4 DB
- english hw help
- I Need a Web designer
- assignment
- BUS-352 Module 6 DQ 2 - Give an example of a situation in which you believe a Type I Error is more serious. Give an example of a situation in which you believe a Type II Error is more serious. In each case, why do you think so?