Analysis of Ground Rules
ssherman02
Write a minimum of two pages in which you recall team experiences you have had in which a team was effective and another in which it was not. Write a description of these teams and their tasks, paying particular attention to the behavioral expectations for which the team members held each other accountable.
The ground rules for a team are the spoken and unspoken functional rules and expectations that help or hinder the team in reaching a goal. Systems thinking can inform an analysis of team ground rules in that it addresses the interrelationships between people and departments, and the way things are done in an organization. Understanding the larger contexts in an organization can help you communicate with those affected by a problem or issue.
Think of a team experience you have had in which the team was effective. Write a description of this team and its tasks, paying particular attention to the behavioral expectations for which the team members held each other accountable (these might have been spoken or unspoken). List the ground rules and describe how the rules helped the team perform and work well together.
Think of an team experience you have had in which the team was not effective. Write a description of this team and its tasks, including the spoken or unspoken ground rules that describe the expectations for behavior on this team. Examine the possibility that some members held ground rules that others did not. How might this have been a source of tension? Analyze how this difference in what is expected of team members caused conflict and damaged performance. What effect could a dialogue about ground rules as a method of team learning have had for this group?
Your assessment should be a minimum of 2 pages in length, double-spaced.
- 4 years ago
- 10
Purchase the answer to view it
- groundrules.docx
- BUS644 Operations Management
- Assignment 5: Business Plan
- Philosophy paper.
- for hifsa
- Assignments for njosh only
- physics/energy
- Industrial Hygiene case study
- PL201 Introduction to Philosophy 4 Assignment "Short Paper on Aristotle concept of Eudaimonia"
- ACCT 2004 ASSIGNMENT (a) Extracts from CFQ’s Statement of financial position at 31 March 2013, with comparatives appear below: 31 March 2013 31 March 2012 $million $million Property, plant and equipment 635 645 Non-current asset investments at fair value
- Unit 2 Discussion