Case Study 6.1: Columbus InstrumentsThis case is based on a true story of a once-successful organization that had allowed its project management practices to degenerate to the point where assignment to a project team was often a mark of disfavor and a sign of pending termination. The case involves issues of motivation, structural effects on projects, and project team staffing. It offers students an opportunity to see how, if left unchecked, certain behaviors by department heads and others in the organization can work counter to the desires to use project teams to improve organizational profitability and instead make them a dumping ground for malcontents and poor performers.Questions
- What are the implications of CIC’s approach to staffing project teams? Is the company using project teams as training grounds for talented fast-trackers, or as dumping grounds for poor performers?
- How would you advise the CEO to correct the problem? Where would you start?
- Discuss how issues of organizational structure and power played a role in the manner in which project management declined in effectiveness at CIC.
- 2 months ago
- Part A (15 points each for a possible total of 30 points) (1) After several years of business, Abel, Barney, and Cole are liquidating. The following are post-closing account balances.Cash 18,000Inventory 73,000Other assets 157,000 Accounts Payable 61,000
- My Kevin assignment
- obesity homework 2
- if you do not have these textbooks do not bother me!
- As a general rule, it is desirable to finance the permanent assets, including "permanent current assets", with long-term debt and equity.
- di1 pro
- paper RESERVED FOR HIFSA
- Pillars of Society Matrix
- 10 months ago
Assigned Readings:Chapter 6. Project Team Building, Conflict, and Negotiation Read and reflect on the assigned readings for the week. Then post what you thought was the most important concept(s), …2 months ago