Part 1: List, in bullet point fashion, your top 3 Take-Aways (knowledge that you gained) from reading Chapter 9. See the assignment instructions for examples of appropriate Take-Aways.
Things to know about 'take-away' statements:
• 'Take-Away's' are substantial statements that identify important and factual information about the chapters read.
• Statements should represent information that students find interesting or important to each segment in the episode and does not need to be verbatim (exactly as stated) from the video but can be a summary statement that reflects information. Think college-level thoughts
Example of a poor statement: GMOs are bad.
Why it is poor - not substantial and definitely not college level thinking.
Example of an appropriate statement: GMOs have not been tested thoroughly. GMO safety tests are sometimes as short as 90 days, which is not long enough to prove that a substance is safe for long term, multi-generational human consumption.
Why it is appropriate - brings up a couple of points and the statement itself reflects more substantial college-level structure and thinking.
DIFFERENT FROM ALL OTHER READING SUBMISSIONS
Below, provide complete and critical thoughts for each of the four questions about the chapters read. Be sure to remove the word ANSWER before completing and submission.
1. Summarize (in at least 1 FULL paragraph) your parting thoughts about the book 'Agricultural & Food Controversies: What Everyone Should Know'.
2. List 2 ethical theories that represent the authors (as a collective group of authors, not each author) purpose in writing this book. Discuss why you believe these theories to be appropriate for the authors.
3. What do you see as the most controversial topic - or topics - in the Agriculture industry? Discuss your response thoroughly.
4. What can you do locally, state, national or globally wide to have a positive impact on the issue - or issues - you list above?
1.What are your thoughts about our book ‘Agricultural & Food Controversies – What Everyone Should Know’? Did you find the book to be relative? Do you recommend using this book in future semesters? Any other thoughts or feedback about the book? Is a book necessary at all in this course?
2. What are your thoughts about this class? Did you have any issues finding materials or accessing weekly assignments? Do you have any recommendations for improving the submit work for future semesters?
3. What are your thoughts about assignments for this class? Considering this was a fully online course, was the workload too heavy? To light? Just right? Do you have any suggestions for improving the modules/tasks/assignments for future semesters?
4. Any other thoughts you would like to share regarding how the professor can improve this course for future semesters?
- Emily Blunt
- Dr Ava_Mia
- Prof Berry
- jim claire
- Quickly answer
- Dr shamille Clara
- Homework Pro
- university work
- RESPECT WRITER
- Jessica Luis
- Catherine Owens
- Paula Hog
- Rey writer
- brilliant answers
- Emily Clare
- Rosie September
- Emily Michael
- Terry Roberts
- Ranchoddas Chanchad PhD
- Miss Professor
- Angelina May
- phyllis young
- Wendy Lewis
- wizard kim
- Prof. Ali_Raza
- prof avril
- Eva Green
- nadia tutor
- Dr. Elahi
- Casey Celia
- RELIABLE PAPERS
- Jenny Boom
- OUTLINE need to be complete
- MGM355 needs to be 30% or below its a must
- human resource administrative assistant
- 4.4 biomes
- SAP Homework
- Discussion Board Posting2- Psych Class
- Scene to Paragraph
- As a parole officer, how would you handle a juvenile who will turn 18 years old in 2 months and who persistently violates his curfew, which is a condition of his parole program? Include course material in your answer as required.