The Heart of Great Management
pilap07
J U N E 1 2 , 2 0 0 8
The Heart of Great Managing If your employees are so important, why do so many
companies entrust them to bad managers?
BY R O D D WAG N E R A N D J I M H A R T E R
Adapted from 12: The Elements of Great Managing
"Our people are our greatest asset."
It is the strangest line in business today. No one knows who first uttered it, but it
proved to be so contagious that nearly every CEO says it at some point. It's a
nice sentiment to work into a speech. It's comforting. It makes the executive
seem more in touch, more humane.
But the statement has become a
joke. Hearing the line from a
company leader who had no such
personal convictions, one mid-level
manager turned to his friend and said
it reminded him of the apocryphal
story of a children's radio show host
who finished the broadcast and, not
realizing the microphone was still on,
said, "That oughta hold the little
bastards!"
The same detachment showed up several years ago at the executive
presentation of 12 Elements results for a Fortune 500 financial company.
"Watch out for the CEO," a colleague warned the presenter. "He's going to go
after you."
The presentation proceeded without incident until it reached a slide highlighting
the huge spread of engagement levels within the company. "You have at the
same time some of the most engaged and least engaged workgroups in the
entire Gallup database," the presenter said.
At that, the chief executive pounced. "What you just said means nothing!" he
asserted. "Having some of the best and some of the worst has to be true of just
about every company in the world."
The CEO was right. It is, in fact, not unusual for a large company to have its least
engaged team at the 2 or 3 percentile, worse than all but a few percent of
the worldwide scores. Nor is it unusual that a big organization's most committed
team is more engaged than 99 out of 100 in that repository.
The presenter conceded the point and countered: "You're absolutely right. It
happens all the time. But if I were to come in here and say you have some of the
most profitable groups we'd ever seen and some of the biggest money losers,
would you say that's meaningless just because that also happens at other
firms?"
nd rd
"I get your point," said the business leader.
Cost of lost productivity
Somehow that point gets lost on many executives. Too often, the title of
manager is doled out as a reward for tenure and connections, for solid
performance that demonstrates no particular ability to deal with people, or as
the sole path of progress in a company that does not know how to create highly
valued non-managerial positions. Enterprises that wouldn't think of letting an
accounting school dropout run its finances, a Luddite run IT, or a klutz supervise
safety routinely let dislikable, insincere, or aloof men and women assume
stewardship for a crew of the company's ostensibly greatest assets.
In a seminar Gallup conducted for a regional bank, the middle managers in
attendance were asked to write a speech to a hypothetical group of honor
students extolling the virtues of the company in hopes of attracting them to
join. The speeches were what one would expect: boilerplate language about the
prominence of the company, chances for advancement, and the generous
benefits package. After the managers had delivered these addresses to their
classmates, they were challenged with a question one of these honor students
might ask: "If I join your bank, can you assure me I'll have a really good
manager?" The room fell silent. They looked around and shrugged. For all the
grand oration they just completed, these leaders had to admit they could not
guarantee this most basic benefit to a new recruit. (See "Job Seekers Ask:
Who's the Boss?" in the "See Also" area on this page.)
Casually ask "Who's ripping off the company?" at an evening reception, and you
will get puzzled stares. "No one that I know of," they respond. Ask "Who in this
company is a lousy manager?" and the stories just keep coming. Just as people
will admit to being bad with math more than they will admit illiteracy, business
tolerates interpersonal incompetence where it would never allow financial
malfeasance. And yet, barring a few headline-making examples of high-level
fraud, companies lose far more to employee disengagement than they lose to
theft.
Money left on the table
This relative negligence is the reason that while those companies actively
working on employee engagement see appreciable increases, the overall trend
in quality of work experience is flat. The proportion of engaged workers in the
United States has ranged from 26% in 2000, to 31% in 2002, to 28% percent in
2005, to 30% in 2008. Levels of engagement appear to change dramatically not
with macroeconomic swings, but only through better managers -- and the
aggregate quality of managers isn't improving. The same can be said for
managers in other countries Gallup has randomly sampled over the years.
The national and global results indicate that employee engagement is being
destroyed in some places as fast as it is being improved in others. It's a real
blind spot in the corporate world -- a rare situation in which, never mind the
moral considerations, executives aren't even being selfish very well. The failure
to make work more invigorating has industry leaving a lot of money on the table.
The cost of lost productivity due to disengagement, conservatively expressed,
is $300 billion in the United States, 226.5 billion Euro in Germany, and $6 billion
USD in Singapore. The estimates are high for every country Gallup has studied.
Despite the flat aggregate trend,
changes at the company level are
often substantial and lasting. For the
publicly traded organizations that
achieved top-quartile status in the
Gallup database and that realized
superior earnings per share growth, it
was typical to see dramatic change in engagement over time. Many of these
organizations started with less than one-fourth of their workgroups in the top
quartile of the engagement database. By the fifth year of holding managers
accountable for the 12 Elements, it was not unusual to find 60% or more in the
top quartile. In the space of just a few years, the ratio of engaged to actively
disengaged employees had doubled as a result of managers' sincere efforts.
Valuing finances -- and people
Ask great managers what motivates them, and you get the most non-financial
of root causes for the string of ultimately profitable events. "Oh, I love them to
death," said one supervisor. "Honestly and truthfully, from the bottom of my
heart, there's not anyone who works on my staff that I have any hard feelings
with. I feel like if I had to go to battle for them, I would, and I'll stand beside them
any day for anything."
"People are more important than facts and figures," said Philippe Lescornez, a
manager at Masterfoods in Brussels, a division of Mars, Incorporated. "People
are very important to my happiness; I could not be happy on my own." (See
"Performance Reviews Without the Anxiety" in the "See Also" area on this page.)
"Well, they're like my family," said another manager. "I want them to be as happy
working here as I am. I love my job, and I've worked here for 17 years. I've always
wanted to be a store manager. And I want them to always come to work and be
happy."
In our studies of hundreds of thousands of managers and work teams across
the globe, it is very clear that great managers have an instinctive awareness that
what they are doing is contributing more than profit. Great managers achieve
sustained profitability because they make a connection to something beyond
profit. They see the result of their work in the life of each person they manage.
Their impact transcends mere business. For many, it is an almost spiritual issue,
no matter their particular faith. Their motivation stems from deeply held beliefs
about their responsibility to those around them. Whether they believe it is
Providence or pure chance that puts them in the same office or factory with
their team, these managers understand viscerally the scientific truth that what
they do will have a large effect -- maybe a lifelong effect -- on their colleagues.
They realize, given the percentage of waking time their teams spend at work,
how much influence they have, not just over their people's "work life," but their
whole life. (See "Your Job May Be Killing You" in the "See Also" area on this page.)
Most will tell you management is a solemn responsibility, something from which
they take tremendous satisfaction, but it also weighs heavily on their
consciences because they take it so seriously. With it, they say, rests not only
the fiduciary responsibilities of protecting other people's money and striving for
a good return, but a special kind of stewardship over people's lives. Employees
say that both sides of the coin, the personal and the professional, depend on a
manager who can give them the guidance, support, advocacy, and resources
that motivate them to reciprocate with their best efforts.
"These are people's lives. I have an obligation," said Pete Wamsteeker, a
manager at Cargill in West Branch, Iowa. "I can't make mistakes with that. I really
have an obligation to do it right, and I'm going to invest the time to do it right."
(See "Investing in Employees' Development" in the "See Also" area on this page.)
Therein lies the irony. The managers who are best at getting the most from
people are those who give the most to them. Those who create the greatest
financial performance start with the least pecuniary motivations. They work
hard to do the right thing for their people, and they end up doing well.
That is the heart of great managing.
Jim Harter, Ph.D., is Chief Scientist, Workplace Management and
Wellbeing for Gallup's workplace management practice. He is coauthor
of the New York Times bestsellers 12: The Elements of Great Managing
and Wellbeing: The Five Essential Elements.
Rodd Wagner is coauthor of the New York Times bestseller 12: The
Elements of Great Managing. He is coauthor of Power of 2: How to Make
the Most of Your Partnerships at Work and in Life.
RELEASE DATE: June 12, 2008
SOURCE: Gallup https://news.gallup.com/businessjournal/107602/Heart-Great-Managing.aspx
CONTACT: Gallup World Headquarters, 901 F Street, Washington, D.C., 20001, U.S.A
+1 202.715.3030
Copyright © 2016 Gallup, Inc. All rights reserved.
Gallup, Inc. maintains several registered and unregistered trademarks that include but may not be limited
to: A8, Accountability Index, Business Impact Analysis, BE10, CE11, CE11 Accelerator, Clifton
StrengthsExplorer, Clifton StrengthsFinder, Customer Engagement Index, Customer Engagement
Management, Dr. Gallup Portrait, Employee Engagement Index, Enetrix, Engagement Creation Index,
Follow This Path, Gallup, Gallup Brain, Gallup Business Journal, GBJ, Gallup Consulting, Gallup-Healthways
Well-Being Index, Gallup Management Journal, GMJ, Gallup Panel, Gallup Press, Gallup Tuesday Briefing,
Gallup University, Gallup World News, HumanSigma, HumanSigma Accelerator, ICE11, I10, L3, ME25,
NurseInsight, NurseStrengths, Patient Quality System, Performance Optimization, Power of 2,
PrincipalInsight, Q12, Q12 Accelerator, Q12 Advantage, Selection Research, Inc., SE25, SF34, SRI, Soul of
the City, Strengths Spotlight, Strengths-Based Selling, StatShot, StrengthsCoach, StrengthsExplorer,
StrengthsFinder, StrengthsInsight, StrengthsQuest, SupportInsight, TX(R+E+R)=P3, TeacherInsight, The
Gallup Path, The Gallup Poll, The Gallup School, VantagePoint, Varsity Management, Wellbeing Finder,
Achiever, Activator, Adaptability, Analytical, Arranger, Belief, Command, Communication, Competition,
Connectedness, Consistency, Context, Deliberative, Developer, Discipline, Empathy, Fairness, Focus,
Futuristic, Harmony, Ideation, Includer, Individualization, Input, Intellection , Learner, Maximizer, Positivity,
Relator, Responsibility, Restorative, Self-Assurance, Significance, Strategic, and Woo. All other trademarks
are the property of their respective owners. These materials are provided for noncommercial, personal
use only. Reproduction prohibited without the express permission of Gallup, Inc.