Nursing Assignment

profilelebhdsdajt
TEACHINGPROJECTPaper100ptspkSpring20181.docx

TEACHING PROJECT PAPER rubric100 points

This rubric will be used to grade your TEACHING Project Paper and Power Point Presentation

 

Levels of Achievement

Criteria

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Content  Introduction Purpose

Significance

20 points

18.6 to 20 points

Identifies objective and why the objective is important to explore. Determinants of health for project covered in detail and supported by research. -Support for project is complex, complete, & in-depth. Writer involved with subject, not merely doing an assignment. --Clear and appropriate organization, with introduction purpose and significance clearly stated with effective transitions between sections.

17 to 18.59 points

Identifies objective and why the objective is important to explore included however not clearly stated.

Determinants of health for project addressed but minimally supported and lacking in depth or complexity. Organization, introduction, purpose and significance and transitions slightly lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.

15 to 16.9 points

Identification of objective incomplete or missing why the objective is important to explore. -Support for project is not substantially sufficient. Organization, introduction, purpose, significance and transitions are inconsistent, lacking clarity and depth

0 to 14.9 points

Identification of objective and why the objective is important to explore is missing.

Support for project barely sufficient, and/or organization, introduction, purpose, significance and transitions are inconsistent, lacking clarity and depth

Quality of Research/Review of Literature

20 points

18.6 to 20 points

All components of the review of the literature covered in-depth. Research in depth and beyond the obvious revealing new insights

17 to 18.59 points

All components of the review of the literature are addressed but not all of the research is in depth and does not beyond the obvious, does not reveal new insights

15 to 16.9 points

All components of the review of literature are addressed by incomplete/sketchy

0 to 14.9 points

Some components of review of literature missing or not addressed.

Participants

10 points

9.3 to 10 points

All components of participants criteria covered in depth with extensive clear and appropriate discussion of the age/gender/cultural variables that impact the presentation of the project

8.5 to 9.29 points

All components of participants criteria covered in depth but discussion of the age/gender/cultural variables that impact the presentation of the project slightly lacking clarity and/or appropriateness

7.5 to 8.49 points

Some of the components of participants criteria covered in depth but discussion of the age/gender/cultural variables that impact the presentation of the project lacking clarity and/or appropriateness

0 to 7.49 points

Components of participants criteria not covered and/or missing or discussion of the age/gender/cultural variables that impact the presentation of the project missing or not appropriate

Learning /Content /Materials Table

20 points

18.6 to 20 points

Learning Objectives, Content Outline/Strategies/Materials and Evaluation Table well developed and included in body of the paper with more than 2 objectives stated in clear and measurable terms

17 to 18.59 points

Learning Objectives/Content Outline/Strategies/Materials and Evaluation Table included in body of the paper with 2 objectives stated in clear and measurable terms, but table not well developed

15 to 16.9 points

Learning Objectives/Content Outline/Strategies/Materials and Evaluation Table included in body of the paper but with less than 2 objectives stated in clear and measurable terms and table not well developed

0 to 14.9 points

Learning Objectives/Content Outline/Strategies/Materials and Evaluation Table not included in body of the paper and/or missing objectives stated in clear and measurable terms

 

Levels of Achievement

Criteria

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Publicity/Evaluation Plan

15 points 

13.95 to 15 points

Publicity and evaluation plans extensive, well-developed and appropriate for project with extensive EBP documentation

12.75 to 13.9 points

Publicity and evaluation plans developed and appropriate for project but not extensive. EBP documentation adequate

12.75 to 13.9 points

Publicity and evaluation plans minimally developed and/or inappropriate for project. Minimal EBP documentation

0 to 11.24 points

Publicity and evaluation plans superficially addressed and/or inappropriate for project

No EBP documentation.

Grammar/ Mechanics

10 points

9.3 to 10 points

2 or less errors in format or punctuation or capitalization. --Consistent and appropriate voice. -- Sophisticated and precise word choice. Paragraph size appropriate --No spelling errors. No slang. --No errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense. --Met all style and min/max page requirements

8.5 to 9.29 points

4 or less errors in format, punctuation, or capitalization. -- Voice mostly consistent and appropriate. Lengthy paragraphs -- Fairly effective word choice. --No more than 2 spelling errors. --Fewer than 1 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense. --Met most style and min/max page requirements

7.5 to 8.49 points

6 or less errors in format, punctuation or capitalization. Voice somewhat consistent and appropriate. Errors distract from readability. Lengthy paragraphs -- Correct word choice. --More than 3 spelling errors. --More than 2 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense. Failed to meet style and/or min/max page requirements

0 to 7.49 points

Many errors in format, punctuation, or capitalization. Paper fails to flow in a logical sequence. Failed to meet style and/or min/max page requirements.

Bibliography

5 points

4.65 to 5 points

Sources reliable and properly cited. A minimum of 10 references (>6 EBP journal articles. All references correctly cited in the paper and the bibliography. All information relevant to topic.

4.25 to 4.64 points

Sources reliable and properly cited but has secondary references. A minimum of 10 references (<6 EBP journal articles. All references correctly cited in the paper and the bibliography. Information relevant to topic.

3.75 to 4.24 points

Sources reliable and properly cited. Articles do not substantially support your topic. 10 references (>6 EBP journal articles. All information relevant to topic.

0 to 3.74 points

Second hand sources and incorrectly cited. Does not have a minimum of 10 references and/ or have less than 6 EBP journal articles. All information relevant to topic.