Order 1565761: Health Care and Wellness Provider and Faith Diversity

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code
HLT-302 HLT-302-MWF1230A Health Care and Wellness Provider and Faith Diversity: First Draft 100.0
Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less Than Satisfactory (65.00%) Satisfactory (75.00%) Good (85.00%) Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Content 70.0%
Address Several of the Worldview Questions Through Health Care Analysis 20.0% Christianity and selected faith are not present. Christianity and selected faith are present but worldview implications are not addressed through a proper health care analysis. Christianity and selected faith are present but few worldview implications are addressed through a proper health care analysis. Christianity and selected faith are present and many worldview implications are addressed through a health care analysis. Christianity and selected faith are present and all of the worldview implications are addressed through a Health Care analysis. 13.00/20.00
Comparative Analysis of the Different Belief Systems 20.0% A comparative analysis of health care and the different belief systems within the health care system is not present. A comparative analysis of health care and the different belief systems within the health care system, reinforcing major themes with insights gained from your research, is present but lacks detail. A comparative analysis of health care and the different belief systems within the health care system, reinforcing major themes with insights gained from your research, is present in detail. A comparative analysis of health care and the different belief systems within the health care system, reinforcing major themes with insights gained from your research, is present with details and specific examples. A comparative analysis of health care and the different belief systems within the health care system, reinforcing major themes with insights gained from your research, shows a deep understanding of the connections. 13.00/20.00
Spiritual Perspective on Healing in conclusion 10.0% A description of spiritual perspective on healing is not present. A description of spiritual perspective on healing is present. A description of spiritual perspective on healing is present, including adequate detail. A description of spiritual perspective on healing is present, including detail and some examples. A description of spiritual perspective on healing shows a deep understanding of the connections. 0.00/10.00
Critical Components of Healing 5.0% Identification of at least 2 critical components common to health care that creates spiritual components of healing is not present. Identification of at least 2 critical components common to health care that creates spiritual components of healing are present but does not include explanation. Identification of at least 2 critical components common to health care that creates spiritual components of healing are present and includes explanation. Identification of at least 2 critical components common to health care that creates spiritual components of healing and includes explanation with details and examples. Explanation of at least 2 critical components common to health care that creates spiritual components of healing are present and shows a deep understanding of the connections. 3.25/5.00
Important Factors to People of a Particular Faith When Cared for by Health Care Providers Whose Spiritual Beliefs Differ From Their Own 5.0% Important factors to people of a particular faith when cared for by health care providers whose spiritual beliefs differ from their own are not present. Important factors to people of a particular faith when cared for by health care providers whose spiritual beliefs differ from their own are present but lacks detail. Important factors to people of a particular faith when cared for by health care providers whose spiritual beliefs differ from their own are present in adequate detail. Important factors to people of a particular faith when cared for by health care providers whose spiritual beliefs differ from their own are present in detail with specific examples. Important factors to people of a particular faith when cared for by health care providers whose spiritual beliefs differ from their own are present and show a deep understanding of the connections. 3.25/5.00
Description What Was Learned From the Research and How This Learning Can Be Applied to a Health Care Provider in the conclusion 10.0% A description of what was learned from the research and how this can be applied to health care providers is not present. A description of what was learned from the research and how this can be applied to health care providers is present. A description of what was learned from the research and how this can be applied to health care providers is present with adequate detail. A description of what was learned from the research and how this can be applied to health care providers is present with detail and some examples. A description of what was learned from the research and how this can be applied to health care providers shows a deep understanding of the connections. 0.00/10.00
Organization and Effectiveness 20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. 4.55/7.00
Argument Logic and Construction 8.0% Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. 6.00/8.00
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. 3.75/5.00
Format 10.0%
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct. 3.75/5.00
Research Citations (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% No reference page is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. 3.75/5.00
Total Weightage 100% 54.30/100.0