Reflective Analysis: Risk Management and the Role of Managed Care

profileujunwa
Rubric_Print_Formatw5.xlsx

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
HLT-308V HLT-308V-O500 Reflective Analysis: Risk Management and the Role of Managed Care 70.0
Criteria Percentage 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) 2: Less Than Satisfactory (65.00%) 3: Satisfactory (75.00%) 4: Good (85.00%) 5: Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
% Scaling 100.0%
Administrative Role of a Health Care Organization in Ensuring Compliance With Managed Care Organization (MCO) Risk Management Standards 25.0% An assessment of the administrative role of a health care organization in ensuring compliance with MCO risk management standards is not included. An assessment of the administrative role of a health care organization in ensuring compliance with MCO risk management standards is partially incorporated, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. An assessment of the administrative role of a health care organization in ensuring compliance with MCO risk management standards is present, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components. An assessment of the administrative role of a health care organization in ensuring compliance with MCO risk management standards is incorporated in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support. An assessment of the administrative role of a health care organization in ensuring compliance with MCO risk management standards is comprehensive. The submission further incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.
Value of MCO Regulatory Statutes to a Health Care Organization 25.0% An explanation of the value MCO regulatory statutes provide to a health care organization is not included. An explanation of the value MCO regulatory statutes provide to a health care organization is partially incorporated, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. An explanation of the value MCO regulatory statutes provide to a health care organization is present, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components. An explanation of the value MCO regulatory statutes provide to a health care organization is incorporated in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support. An explanation of the value MCO regulatory statutes provide to a health care organization is present and comprehensive. The submission further incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.
MCO Responsibilities Relative to ACA and CMS Focus on Fraud, Waste, and Abuse Laws 25.0% A description of the MCO responsibilities relative to the ACA and CMS focus on fraud, waste, and abuse laws is not included. A description of the MCO responsibilities relative to the ACA and CMS focus on fraud, waste, and abuse laws is partially incorporated, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. A description of the MCO responsibilities relative to the ACA and CMS focus on fraud, waste, and abuse laws is present, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components. A description of the MCO responsibilities relative to the ACA and CMS focus on fraud, waste, and abuse laws is incorporated in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support. A description of the MCO responsibilities relative to the ACA and CMS focus on fraud, waste, and abuse laws is comprehensive. The submission further incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.
Thesis Development and Purpose 5.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction 5.0% Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage 100%