Online Database or Online Query-Based Report

profilebttk20032004
Rubric_Print_FormatA.xlsx

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code
HLT-605 HLT-605-O101 Online Database or Online Query-Based Report 70.0
Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less than Satisfactory (74.00%) Satisfactory (79.00%) Good (87.00%) Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
HLT 605 Online Database or Online Query-Based Report Rubric 70.0%
Demographic Description of Selected Population 15.0% A specific health concern or injury for a population is not represented, or a demographic description of the selected population is not presented. A specific health concern or injury for a chosen demographic is briefly summarized. The demographic description of the selected population is incomplete and contains inaccuracies. A specific health concern or injury for a chosen demographic is presented. The demographic description of the selected population is complete, but lacks significant supportive details and evidence to support claims. A specific health concern or injury for a chosen demographic is presented. The demographic description of the selected population is complete, some additional details or evidence is needed to fully support claims. A specific health concern or injury for a chosen demographic is presented. A thorough description of the demographic description of the selected population is complete. The report includes relevant details and is strongly supported by evidence.
Noticeable Trends In Morbidity and/or Mortality by Race, Gender, and Geographic Location Where Specified 15.0% No criteria for noticeable trends were discussed (morbidity and/or mortality by race, gender, and geographic location). Only some criteria for noticeable trends location were discussed (morbidity and/or mortality by race, gender, and geographic location). The discussion of trends is incomplete and contains inaccuracies. Most criteria for noticeable trends were discussed (morbidity and/or mortality by race, gender, and geographic location). The discussion of trends is vague, contains inaccuracies or lacks substantial evidence to fully support claims. Criteria for noticeable trends were discussed (morbidity and/or mortality by race, gender, and geographic location). The discussion of trends is presented, but needs additional detail or evidence to fully support claims. Criteria for noticeable trends were thoroughly discussed (morbidity and/or mortality by race, gender, and geographic location). The discussion of trends is clear, and strong evidence is presented to fully support claims.
Implications for Public Health Intervention or Involvement Based on Results and Trends 20.0% Report results and trends are not analyzed to determine the implications for public health intervention; a public health intervention is not presented. Report results and trends are only partially used in the analysis to determine the implications for public health intervention. The analysis is incomplete and does not offer support for the implications presented. Report results and trends are used in the analysis to determine the implications for public health intervention. The analysis is general, and contains some inaccuracies; the implications presented for public health intervention are not relevant for the demographic presented. Report results and trends are used in the analysis to determine the implications for public health intervention. The analysis requires more evidence or details to fully support the implications presented for public health intervention for the demographic presented. Report results and trends are clearly used in the analysis to determine the implications for public health intervention. The analysis provides sufficient evidence and details to fully support the implications presented for public health intervention for the demographic presented.
Consideration of Ethical and Legal Principals Pertaining to the Collection, Maintenance, Use and Dissemination of Epidemiologic Data 20.0% Report does not explore the ethical and legal principals pertaining to the collection, maintenance, use and dissemination of epidemiologic data. Report explores some ethical and legal principals pertaining to the collection, maintenance, use and dissemination of epidemiologic data. Considerations discussed do not demonstrate an understanding of the significance of the ethical or legal aspects involved with epidemiologic data. Report generally explores the ethical and legal principals pertaining to the collection, maintenance, use and dissemination of epidemiologic data. Considerations discussed demonstrate a general understanding of the ethical or legal aspects involved with epidemiologic data. Report explores the ethical and legal principals pertaining to the collection, maintenance, use and dissemination of epidemiologic data. Considerations discussed demonstrate an understanding of the ethical or legal aspects involved with epidemiologic data. Report explores, in-depth, the ethical and legal principals pertaining to the collection, maintenance, use and dissemination of epidemiologic data. Considerations discussed demonstrate an exceptional understanding of the ethical or legal aspects involved with epidemiologic data.
Organization and Effectiveness 20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Paragraph Development and Transitions 8.0% Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed. Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident. Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose. There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Format 10.0%
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage 100%