IOM Future of Nursing Report and Nursing
smartswanRubric_Print_Format5.xlsx
Rubic_Print_Format
Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points | |||||
NRS-440VN | NRS-440VN-O502 | IOM Future of Nursing Report and Nursing | 165.0 | |||||
Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less Than Satisfactory (75.00%) | Satisfactory (79.00%) | Good (89.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
Content | 80.0% | |||||||
Robert Wood Foundation Committee Work and IOM Report | 10.0% | A description of the work of the Robert Wood Foundation Committee Initiative that led to the IOM report is omitted. | An incomplete description of the work of the Robert Wood Foundation Committee Initiative that led to the IOM report is presented. | A summary of the work of the Robert Wood Foundation Committee Initiative that led to the IOM report is presented. There are inaccuracies or misinterpretations. | A description of the work of the Robert Wood Foundation Committee Initiative that led to the IOM report is presented. There are slight inaccuracies. | A clear and accurate description of the work of the Robert Wood Foundation Committee Initiative that led to the IOM report is presented. | ||
Key Messages Transforming Nursing | 15.0% | The four key messages are omitted. | Fewer than four key messages are presented, and the messages contain inaccuracies. An incomplete discussion on how they transformed nursing is presented. | The four key messages that structure the IOM report are generally outlined. A summary of how these transformed some aspects of nursing is presented, but there are some inaccuracies. | The four key messages that structure the IOM report are outlined. A description of how these transformed key aspects of nursing is presented. | The four key messages that structure the IOM report are clearly outlined. A description of how these transformed nursing practice, nursing education and training, nursing leadership, and nursing workforce development are thoroughly discussed. | ||
State-Based Action Coalitions and Their Help in Advancing Goals form IOM Report | 15.0% | The role of state-based action coalitions is omitted. | The role of state-based action coalitions is incomplete. It is unclear how these advance the goals in the IOM report. | The role of state-based action coalitions is summarized. A summary of how they help advance the goals in the IOM report is presented. | The role of state-based action coalitions is discussed. A discussion of how they help advance the goals in the IOM report is presented. | The role of state-based action coalitions is thoroughly discussed. A detailed and accurate discussion of how they help advance the goals in the IOM report is presented. | ||
State Action Coalition Initiatives Advancing Nursing Profession | 20.0% | Initiatives spearheaded by a state action coalition are omitted. | Only one initiative spearheaded by a state action coalition is presented. The narrative contains omissions and inaccuracies. How these initiatives advance the nursing profession are incomplete. | Two initiatives spearheaded by a state action coalition are summarized. How these initiatives advance the nursing profession are generally discussed. There are some inaccuracies. | Two initiatives spearheaded by a state action coalition and how they advance the nursing profession are discussed. | Two initiatives spearheaded by a state action coalition and how they advance the nursing profession are thoroughly discussed. The discussion demonstrates a clear understanding of the state action committee and the role in advancing the nursing profession. | ||
Barriers to Advancement | 20.0% | Barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state are omitted. How nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers is omitted. | Barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state are unclear. How nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers is incomplete. | Barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state are presented. How nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers is summarized. There are inaccuracies, or more information is needed. | Barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state and how nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers are described. | Barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state are thoroughly explored and how nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers are thoroughly described. | ||
Organization, Effectiveness, and Format | 20.0% | |||||||
Thesis Development and Purpose | 5.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. | Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. | ||
Argument Logic and Construction | 5.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. | ||
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | ||
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 2.0% | Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. | ||
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 3.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. | ||
Total Weightage | 100% |