Assessment Strategies

profilealeena28
Rubric_Print_Format2.xlsx

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
NUR-648E NUR-648E-O501 Assessment Strategies 100.0
Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory 0-75% (0.00%) Less Than Satisfactory 76-80% (80.00%) Satisfactory 81-88% (88.00%) Good 89-92% (92.00%) Excellent 93-100% (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Criteria 100.0%
Instructional Strategies 15.0% Five instructional strategies and a detailed description are not present. Five instructional strategies and a detailed description are present, but lack detail or are incomplete. Five instructional strategies and a detailed description are present. Five instructional strategies and a detailed description are present and well developed. Five instructional strategies and a detailed description are thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Purpose of Instructional Strategy 15.0% The purpose of each strategy is not present. The purpose of each strategy description is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete. The purpose of each strategy is present. The purpose of each strategy is present and well developed. The purpose of each strategy is present and thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Advantages and Disadvantages 15.0% Two advantages and two disadvantages of each strategy are not present. Two advantages and two disadvantages of each strategy are present, but lack detail or are incomplete. Two advantages and two disadvantages of each strategy are present. Two advantages and two disadvantages of each strategy are present and well developed. Two advantages and two disadvantages of each strategy are thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Settings 15.0% An example of two settings and an explanation of the assessment strategy are not present. An example of two settings and an explanation of the assessment strategy are present, but lack detail or are incomplete. An example of two settings and an explanation of the assessment strategy are present. An example of two settings and an explanation of the assessment strategy are present and well developed. An example of two settings and an explanation of the assessment strategy are present and thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Evidence-Based Sources 15.0% Evidence-based sources for each strategy are not present. Evidence-based sources for each strategy are present, but lack detail or are incomplete. Evidence-based sources for each strategy are present. Evidence-based sources for each strategy are present and well developed. Evidence-based sources for each strategy are thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Speaker notes 10.0% Speaker notes are not present. Speaker notes are present, but lack detail or are incomplete. Speaker notes are present. Speaker notes are present and well developed. Speaker notes are thoroughly developed.
Layout 5.0% The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident. The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text. The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability. The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text. The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage 100%