Educational Program on Risk Management Part Two - Slide Presentation

profileujunwa
Rubric_Print_Format1w5B.xlsx

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
HLT-308V HLT-308V-O500 Educational Program on Risk Management Part Two - Slide Presentation 200.0
Criteria Percentage 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) 2: Less Than Satisfactory (65.00%) 3: Satisfactory (75.00%) 4: Good (85.00%) 5: Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
% Scaling 100.0%
Introduction 10.0% Introduction slides are not included. Introduction slides are present, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. Introduction slides provide minimal detail or support. Introduction slides provide appropriate support as to why greater attention to this risk management strategy is needed. Introduction slides are informative and thorough in explaining why increased attention to the proposed risk management strategy is needed. Specific examples are provided where appropriate.
Rationale 10.0% Rationale slides are not included. Rationale slides are present, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. Rationale slides provide minimal detail or support. Rationale slides provide appropriate support as to how the proposed risk management strategy is lacking in the selected plan and how its implementation will better meet compliance standards. Rationale slides are informative and thorough in explaining why the proposed risk management strategy is lacking in the selected plan. Specific examples are provided as to how its implementation will better meet compliance standards.
Support 10.0% Support data slides are not included. Support data slides are present, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. Support data slides provide minimal detail or support. Support data slides provide an appropriate explanation of how the data indicate a need for the proposed risk management initiative. Support data slides are informative and thorough in showing how the data indicate a need for the proposed risk management initiative. Specific examples are provided where appropriate.
Implementation 10.0% Implementation slides are not included. Implementation slides are present, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. Implementation slides provide minimal detail or support. Implementation slides provide appropriate support for how the risk management initiative will be incorporated into the selected health care organization. Implementation slides are informative and thorough in explaining the specific actionable steps by which the selected health care organization can implement the proposed risk management initiative.
Challenges 10.0% Challenges slides are not included. Challenges slides are present, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. Challenges slides provide minimal detail or support. Challenges slides provide appropriate rationale for potential obstacles to the risk management implementation and propose possible solutions. Challenges slides are informative and thorough in explaining potential obstacles to the risk management implementation. Slides also provide specific examples of solutions for navigating or preempting predicted obstacles.
Evaluation Strategy 10.0% Evaluation strategy slides are not included. Evaluation strategy slides are present, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. Evaluation strategy slides provide minimal detail or support. Evaluation strategy slides provide an appropriate explanation of how the evaluation plan will assess alignment with the overall goals of the risk management program. Evaluation strategy slides are informative and thorough in providing specific examples of how the evaluation plan will assess alignment with the short-term, long-term, and end goals of the risk management program.
Opportunities 10.0% Opportunities slides are not included. Opportunities slides are present, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. Opportunities slides provide minimal detail or support. Opportunities slides provide an appropriate explanation of additional risk management improvements along with support for the recommended changes. Opportunities slides are informative and thorough in providing additional risk management improvements along with detailed support for the recommended changes.
Incorporation of Instructor Feedback From Previous Assignment 5.0% Incorporation of instructor feedback from previous assignment is not present. Incorporation of instructor feedback from previous assignment is insufficiently present. Incorporation of instructor feedback from previous assignment is perfunctory. Incorporation of instructor feedback from previous assignment is adequate. Incorporation of instructor feedback from previous assignment is comprehensive.
Presentation of Content 5.0% The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear. The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information. The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other. The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources. The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
Layout 5.0% The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident. The layout shows some structure but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text. The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability. The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text. The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.
Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) 5.0% Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately. Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately. Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part. The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly. The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Few outside sources were used to support the assignment. Limited research is apparent. The information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Research and citations are adequate regarding source, number, and rigor of resources selected. Sources are standard in relevance, quality of outside sources, or timeliness. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Research and citations are timely and relevant, and address all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Research and citations are supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
Total Weightage 100%