Engaging Students in Science Instruction

profileRoyce0615
Rubric_Print_Format12.xlsx

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
ELM-570 ELM-570-O500 Lope Talk - Engaging Students in Science Instruction 60.0
Criteria Percentage No Submission (0.00%) Insufficient (69.00%) Approaching (74.00%) Acceptable (87.00%) Target (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Content 100.0%
Lopes Talk 35.0% Not addressed. Lopes Talk video is poorly developed and is missing components of examples to engage students through the instruction of science as a professional development to fellow science teachers. Lopes Talk video is underdeveloped and presented with vague examples to engage students through the instruction of science as a professional development to fellow science teachers. Lopes Talk video is adequately developed and presented with clear and direct ways to engage students through the instruction of science as a professional development to fellow science teachers. Lopes Talk video is expertly developed and presented with insightful and proficient ways to engage students through the instruction of science as a professional development to fellow science teachers. Lopes Talk video is expertly developed and presented with insightful and proficient ways to engage students through the instruction of science as a professional development to fellow science teachers.
Video Strategies and Engagement 35.0% Not addressed. Lopes Talk video includes poorly-developed strategies to engage students through active inquiry and poorly support collaboration, science methods, and the creative incorporation of technology. Lopes Talk video includes overly simplistic strategies to engage students through active inquiry and vaguely support collaboration, science methods, and the creative incorporation of technology. Lopes Talk video includes credible and realistic strategies to engage students through active inquiry and clearly support collaboration, science methods, and the creative incorporation of technology. Lopes Talk video includes innovative strategies to engage students through active inquiry and proficiently support collaboration, science methods, and the creative incorporation of technology.
Visual Appeal 5.0% Not addressed. Use of visual elements are poor and inappropriate. Use of visual elements are vague and overly simplistic. Elements do not consistently contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. Relevant visual elements are appropriately used. Visual connections logically contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. Creative and thematic video elements are used to make compelling visual connections that contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships.
Presentation of Content 15.0% Not addressed. The video content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information. The video is generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization, or in their relationships to each other. The video is a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. The video is clear and concise. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 10.0% Not addressed. Presentation is busy and lacks a uniform, clean appearance. Minimal graphics are used. Readability is negatively impacted. Presentation is visually appealing, makes use of images and graphics. Lack of control with formatting is apparent and readability is impacted. Presentation is visually appealing, makes use of images and graphics, and is engaging without being overly busy. Readability is considered. Presentation is visually appealing, makes maximum use of images and graphics, and is engaging without being overly busy. Readability is clearly considered.
Total Weightage 100%