Potential Theoretical Foundations

profileofenwa62
Rubric_Print_Format1.xlsx

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
HCA-807 HCA-807-O500 Potential Theoretical Foundations 170.0
Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less Than Satisfactory (73.00%) Satisfactory (82.00%) Good (91.00%) Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Content 80.0%
Description of the Primary Components of the Theory 10.0% A description of the primary components of the theory is not presented. A description of the primary components of the theory is included, but is incomplete or inaccurate. A description of the primary components of the theory is presented, but is cursory. A description of the primary components of the theory is reasonable and scholarly, but some research sources are outdated. A description of the primary components of the theory is thoroughly presented. Sources are scholarly current or seminal research.
Research-Supported Discussion of Common Applications of the Theory 10.0% A research-supported discussion of common applications of the theory is not presented. A research-supported discussion of common applications of the theory is included, but is incomplete or inaccurate. A research-supported discussion of common applications of the theory is presented, but is cursory. The research used for support is outdated. A research-supported discussion of common applications of the theory is reasonable and scholarly, but some research sources are outdated. A research-supported discussion of common applications of the theory is thoroughly presented. Sources are scholarly current or seminal research.
Discussion of Why the Theory Might Be Viable for Your Proposed Dissertation Study 25.0% A discussion of why the theory might be viable for your proposed dissertation study is not presented. A discussion of why the theory might be viable for your proposed dissertation study is included, but is incomplete or illogical. A discussion of why the theory might be viable for your proposed dissertation study is presented, but is cursory. The research used for support is outdated. A discussion of why the theory might be viable for your proposed dissertation study is reasonable and scholarly, but some research sources are outdated. A discussion of why the theory might be viable for your proposed dissertation study is thoroughly presented. Sources are scholarly current or seminal research.
Discussion of the Limitations of Applying the Theory as a Foundation for the Proposed Dissertation Study 25.0% A discussion of the limitations of applying the theory as a foundation for the proposed dissertation study is not presented. A discussion of the limitations of applying the theory as a foundation for the proposed dissertation study is included, but is incomplete or illogical. A discussion of the limitations of applying the theory as a foundation for the proposed dissertation study is presented, but is cursory. The research used for support is outdated. A discussion of the limitations of applying the theory as a foundation for the proposed dissertation study is reasonable and scholarly, but some research sources are outdated. A discussion of the limitations of applying the theory as a foundation for the proposed dissertation study is thoroughly presented. Sources are scholarly current or seminal research.
Synthesis and Argument 10.0% No synthesis of source information is evident. Statement of purpose is not followed to a justifiable conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses non-credible sources. Synthesis of source information is attempted, but is not successful. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Synthesis of source information is present, but pedantic. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Synthesis of source information is present and meaningful. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Synthesis of source information is present and is scholarly. Argument is clear and convincing, presenting a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Organization and Effectiveness 10.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose 10.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Format 10.0%
Mechanics of Writing 5.0% Mechanical errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
APA Format 5.0% Required format is rarely followed correctly. No reference page is included. No in-text citations are used. Required format elements are missing or incorrect. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Reference page is present. However, in-text citations are inconsistently used. Required format is generally correct. However, errors are present (e.g. font, cover page, margins, and in-text citations). Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented though some errors are present. Required format is used, but minor errors are present (e.g. headings and direct quotes). Reference page is present and includes all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. The document is correctly formatted. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
Total Weightage 100%