Evaluation Project Instructions

profileroelofsl
PaperGradingRubric.pdf

Paper Grading Rubric (Total # of points: 30 )

Levels of Achievement

Criteria Exceeds expectations

Proficient Competent Needs Improvement

Description of background on health behavior and justification for health behavior change intervention (10%)

3 points Provided excellent background on health behavior and justification for health behavior change intervention.

2 points Provided adequate background on health behavior and justification for health behavior change intervention.

1 point Provided somewhat adequate background on health behavior and justification for health behavior change intervention.

0 point Did not provide any background on health behavior or justification for health behavior change intervention.

Description of health behavior change intervention (10%)

3 points Provided excellent description of target population and health behavior change intervention activities.

2 points Provided adequate description of target population and health behavior change intervention activities.

1 point Provided somewhat adequate description of target population and health behavior change intervention activities.

0 point Did not provide any description of target population or health behavior change intervention activities.

Discussion of evaluation methods (30%)

9 points Demonstrated excellent application of key concepts relating to evaluation, specifically quantitative and

6-8 points Demonstrated adequate application of key concepts relating to evaluation, specifically quantitative and

3-5 points Demonstrated somewhat adequate application of key concepts relating to evaluation, specifically quantitative and

0-2 points Did not demonstrate any application of key concepts relating to evaluation.

qualitative methods.

qualitative methods.

qualitative methods

Submission of raw data (10%)

3 points Submitted all quantitative and qualitative data.

2 points Submitted some quantitative and qualitative data.

1 point Submitted only quantitative data or only qualitative data.

0 point Did not submit any data.

Discussion of analysis and interpretation of evaluation data (20%)

6 points Demonstrated excellent application of key concepts relating to analysis and interpretation of data, specifically qualitative data.

4-5 points Demonstrated adequate application of key concepts relating to analysis and interpretation of data, specifically qualitative data.

2-3 points Demonstrated somewhat adequate application of key concepts relating to analysis and interpretation of data, specifically qualitative data.

0-1 point Did not demonstrate any application of key concepts relating to analysis and interpretation of data.

Writing mechanics and formatting (10%)

3 points Consistently used good spelling and grammar in the paper. Paper was correctly formatted. Paper was double- spaced, within 4-6 pages, in 12- pt Arial or Times Roman font, and used 1-inch page margins

2 points Made 1-2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content or Writer did not follow 1 of the following requirements: Double- spaced; 4-6 pages; 12-pt Arial or Times Roman font; 1-inch page margins.

1 point Made 3-4 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content or Writer did not follow 2 of the following requirements: Double- spaced; 4-6 pages; 12-pt Arial or Times Roman font; 1-inch page margins.

0.5 point Made more than 4 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content or Writer did not follow 3 or more of the following requirements: Double- spaced; 4-6 pages; 12-pt Arial or Times Roman font; 1-inch page margins.

Sources/citations (10%)

3 points Cited all sources (e.g. textbook, supplemental reading, outside sources, lecture material) using correct APA format.

2 points Cited most sources using correct APA format.

1 point Cited sources, but did not use APA format at all.

0 point Did not cite any sources.