Evaluation Project Instructions
roelofsl
Paper Grading Rubric (Total # of points: 30 )
Levels of Achievement
Criteria Exceeds expectations
Proficient Competent Needs Improvement
Description of background on health behavior and justification for health behavior change intervention (10%)
3 points Provided excellent background on health behavior and justification for health behavior change intervention.
2 points Provided adequate background on health behavior and justification for health behavior change intervention.
1 point Provided somewhat adequate background on health behavior and justification for health behavior change intervention.
0 point Did not provide any background on health behavior or justification for health behavior change intervention.
Description of health behavior change intervention (10%)
3 points Provided excellent description of target population and health behavior change intervention activities.
2 points Provided adequate description of target population and health behavior change intervention activities.
1 point Provided somewhat adequate description of target population and health behavior change intervention activities.
0 point Did not provide any description of target population or health behavior change intervention activities.
Discussion of evaluation methods (30%)
9 points Demonstrated excellent application of key concepts relating to evaluation, specifically quantitative and
6-8 points Demonstrated adequate application of key concepts relating to evaluation, specifically quantitative and
3-5 points Demonstrated somewhat adequate application of key concepts relating to evaluation, specifically quantitative and
0-2 points Did not demonstrate any application of key concepts relating to evaluation.
qualitative methods.
qualitative methods.
qualitative methods
Submission of raw data (10%)
3 points Submitted all quantitative and qualitative data.
2 points Submitted some quantitative and qualitative data.
1 point Submitted only quantitative data or only qualitative data.
0 point Did not submit any data.
Discussion of analysis and interpretation of evaluation data (20%)
6 points Demonstrated excellent application of key concepts relating to analysis and interpretation of data, specifically qualitative data.
4-5 points Demonstrated adequate application of key concepts relating to analysis and interpretation of data, specifically qualitative data.
2-3 points Demonstrated somewhat adequate application of key concepts relating to analysis and interpretation of data, specifically qualitative data.
0-1 point Did not demonstrate any application of key concepts relating to analysis and interpretation of data.
Writing mechanics and formatting (10%)
3 points Consistently used good spelling and grammar in the paper. Paper was correctly formatted. Paper was double- spaced, within 4-6 pages, in 12- pt Arial or Times Roman font, and used 1-inch page margins
2 points Made 1-2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content or Writer did not follow 1 of the following requirements: Double- spaced; 4-6 pages; 12-pt Arial or Times Roman font; 1-inch page margins.
1 point Made 3-4 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content or Writer did not follow 2 of the following requirements: Double- spaced; 4-6 pages; 12-pt Arial or Times Roman font; 1-inch page margins.
0.5 point Made more than 4 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content or Writer did not follow 3 or more of the following requirements: Double- spaced; 4-6 pages; 12-pt Arial or Times Roman font; 1-inch page margins.
Sources/citations (10%)
3 points Cited all sources (e.g. textbook, supplemental reading, outside sources, lecture material) using correct APA format.
2 points Cited most sources using correct APA format.
1 point Cited sources, but did not use APA format at all.
0 point Did not cite any sources.