Mathematics Technology Presentation

profileRoyce0615
MathematicsTechnologyPresentationRubric.xlsx

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code
ELM-560 ELM-560-O501 Mathematics Technology Presentation 60.0
Criteria Percentage No Submission (0.00%) Insufficient (69.00%) Approaching (74.00%) Acceptable (87.00%) Target (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Criteria 100.0%
Detailed Description and Explanation of Technology 20.0% Not addressed. Presentation is missing components of each form of technology, how it works, and has a poor or vague explanation of how technology aligns to standards. Presentation includes a minimal description of each form of technology, how it works, and a limited explanation of how technology aligns to standards. Presentation includes a clear, thought-out description of each form of technology, how it works, and a clear explanation of how technology aligns to standards. Presentation includes a detailed, insightful description of each form of technology, how it works, and a well-researched explanation of how technology aligns to standards.
Responsible Use of Technology 20.0% Not addressed. Presentation is vague, irrelevant, or missing components of the responsible, legal, and ethical use of technology both at home and school and description of the benefits of using the technological tools to facilitate the creation or transfer of knowledge and skills. Presentation of the responsible, legal, and ethical use of technology both at home and school is underdeveloped and includes a minimal explanation of the benefits of using the technological tools to facilitate the creation or transfer of knowledge and skills. Presentation includes a clear, detailed description of the responsible, legal, and ethical use of technology both at home and school, along with the benefits of using the technological tools to facilitate the creation or transfer of knowledge and skills. Presentation includes a detailed and thoughtful description of the responsible, legal, and ethical use of technology both at home and school, along with a thorough explanation of the benefits of using the technological tools to facilitate the creation or transfer of knowledge and skills.
Technology and Collaboration 20.0% Not addressed. Presentation is vague, irrelevant, or missing components of how each form of technology can be used to support collaboration with families, students, school personnel, and promote engagement in virtual or face-to-face environments. Presentation includes a minimal description of how each form of technology can be used to support collaboration with families, students, school personnel, and promote engagement virtual or face-to-face environments, with limited detail. Presentation includes a detailed description of how each form of technology can be used to support collaboration with families, students, school personnel, and promote engagement in virtual or face-to-face environments. Presentation includes an insightful and creative description of how each form of technology can be used to support collaboration with families, students, school personnel, and promote engagement virtual or face-to-face environments.
Visual Appeal 10.0% Not addressed. Color is dull and/or typographic variations are overused and legibility suffers. Background interferes with readability. Understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships is limited. Minimal use of graphic elements are inadequate. Elements do not consistently contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. There is some variation in type size, color, and layout. Thematic graphic elements are used but not always in context. Visual connections mostly contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. Differences in type size or color are used well and consistently. Appropriate and thematic graphic elements are used to make visual connections that contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. Differences in type size or color are used well and consistently.
Research Citations and Format 15.0% Not addressed. Many citations are missing where needed; or many of the sources are inappropriate for the submission; or APA is attempted where required, but many aspects are missing or mistaken. Some citations may be missing where needed; or some of the sources do not support the submission; or APA is attempted where required, but some aspects are missing or mistaken. All sources are credible, adequate, and support the submission. All required aspects of APA format are correct within the submission. All sources are credible, appropriate, and strongly support the submission. All required aspects of APA format are correct within the submission.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 10.0% Not addressed. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent language or word choice is present. Sentence structure is lacking. Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. A variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.
Presentation Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Not addressed. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
Total Weightage 100%