Case study(2400 words)
Kylin
Subject Guide
Subject Guide
MGM2111 Understanding and Managing Diversity
Marking Rubric
BTHM MGM2111, Understanding and Managing Diversity, Assessment 4: CASE STUDY ANAYSIS |
|
||||||
First name |
|
Surname |
|
Student number |
|
|
|
Criteria |
Score |
Weight (Marks) |
Fail (0% - 49%) |
Pass (50% - 59%) |
Credit (60% - 69%) |
Distinction (70% - 79%) |
High Distinction 80% - 100% |
1. Identify and evaluate the dimensions of cultural difference from the case study using Hofstede’s model. |
|
10 |
Little or no description of identification and evaluation of cultural differences of Hofstede’s model. Confused or unclear. |
Response provides partial discretion of the dimensions of cultural differences using Hofstede’s model |
Response clearly describes some of the cultural differences using Hofstede’s model |
Response is accurate describes clearly identifies and evaluates the dimensions of cultural differences using Hofstede’s model |
Response is accurate and comprehensive; it clearly identifies and evaluates the dimensions of cultural differences using Hofstede’s model |
2.Discuss the strategies the business could implement to improve their diversity practices to avoid cultural differences in terms of employee and client/customer viewpoint. |
|
10
|
Does not discuss the ways in the strategies the business could implement to improve their diversity practices to avoid cultural differences in terms of employee and client/customer viewpoint. |
Discusses adequately at least of the strategies the business could implement to improve their diversity practices to avoid cultural differences in terms of employee and client/customer viewpoint. |
Discusses number of strategies the business could implement to improve their diversity practices to avoid cultural differences in terms of employee and client/customer viewpoint. |
Discusses a number of strategies the business could implement to improve their diversity practices to avoid cultural differences in terms of employee and client/customer viewpoint. . |
Insightful and logically discusses number of strategies the business could implement to improve their diversity practices to avoid cultural differences in terms of employee and client/customer viewpoint Evidence of synthesis of research, ideas, detailed thinking, and additional insights. |
3. Analyse the case study and synthesis the benefits for accounting diversity and the consequences for not accounting diversity |
|
10 |
Does not analyse the case study and synthesis the benefits for accounting diversity and the consequences for not accounting diversity performed very minimum level
|
Considers some extent in analysing case study but lacks insight in synthesis the benefits for accounting diversity and the consequences for not accounting diversity.
|
Discusses analyse the case study and synthesis the benefits for accounting diversity and the consequences for not accounting diversity |
Discusses case study in detail and synthesis the benefits for accounting diversity and the consequences for not accounting diversity discussed in detail with good insights
|
Complete well analysed case study, well prepared and synthesis the benefits for accounting diversity and the consequences for not accounting diversity. |
Score |
|
30 |
Mark awarded |
|
|
0 |
Late penalty |
MGM2111 Understanding and Managing Diversity Page 30 of 37 This Subject Guide complies with the Subject Outline authorised by the Course Committee |
MGM2111 Understanding and Managing Diversity Page 36 of 37 This Subject Guide complies with the Subject Outline authorised by the Course Committee |
MGM2111 Understanding and Managing Diversity Page 37 of 37 This Subject Guide complies with the Subject Outline authorised by the Course Committee |