therapist session

profileshadycoop
gradingrubric.docx

Excellent: Satisfies criteria with excellence

Good: Satisfies criteria.

Average: Satisfies most criteria.

Does not satisfy criteria.

Not Present

Situation

Points Range:5 (10.00%) - 5 (10.00%)

Student has identified the age of the "client." The "client" is under 12 years of age. Student has indicated which "stage" of the "SPICC model" from which the verbatim is being "extracted."

Points Range:4 (8.00%) - 4 (8.00%)

Some information is missing or inappropriate.

Points Range:3 (6.00%) - 3 (6.00%)

Most of the information is missing or not appropriate.

Points Range:1 (2.00%) - 2 (4.00%)

Information is inadequate to understand the context in which this hypothesized verbatim is being placed.

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%)

Client's "voice."

Points Range:10 (20.00%) - 10 (20.00%)

"Client's" statements demonstrate an excellent likeness to a "real" counseling situation. Statements are developmentally appropriate.

Points Range:9 (18.00%) - 9 (18.00%)

"Client's" statements demonstrate a good likeness to a "real" counseling situation. Statements are developmentally appropriate.

Points Range:8 (16.00%) - 8 (16.00%)

"Client's" statements inconsistently demonstrate a likeness to a "real" counseling situation. Statements are sometimes developmentally appropriate.

Points Range:1 (2.00%) - 7 (14.00%)

"Client's" statements do not demonstrate a likeness to a "real" counseling situation. Statements are not developmentally appropriate.

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%)

Therapist's "voice."

Points Range:10 (20.00%) - 10 (20.00%)

The therapist in the dialogue speaks in developmentally appropriate ways that are consistently therapeutic.

Points Range:9 (18.00%) - 9 (18.00%)

The therapist in the dialogue generally speaks in developmentally appropriate ways and the statements are consistently therapeutic.

Points Range:8 (16.00%) - 8 (16.00%)

The therapist in the dialogue generally speaks in developmentally appropriate ways that are inconsistently therapeutic.

Points Range:1 (2.00%) - 7 (14.00%)

The therapist in the dialogue does not speak in developmentally appropriate ways that are consistently therapeutic.

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%)

Skill/"Stage" identification.

Points Range:10 (20.00%) - 10 (20.00%)

The “therapist’s” statements and the skills identified consistently match. The statements are good examples of the stated skills and the skills are appropriately used.

Points Range:9 (18.00%) - 9 (18.00%)

The “therapist’s” statements and the skills identified consistently match. The skills are generally well used.

Points Range:8 (16.00%) - 8 (16.00%)

The “therapist’s” statements and the skills identified consistently match. The skills are not appropriately used.

Points Range:1 (2.00%) - 7 (14.00%)

The “therapist’s” statements and the skills identified do not consistently match. Student does not show mastery of this particular skill.

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%)

Organization

Points Range:10 (20.00%) - 10 (20.00%)

Speakers are clearly identified. Each speaker has at least 20 lines.

Points Range:9 (18.00%) - 9 (18.00%)

Speakers are clearly identified. Each speaker has between 14 and 19 lines.

Points Range:8 (16.00%) - 8 (16.00%)

Speakers are clearly identified. Each speaker has between 10 and 13 lines.

Points Range:1 (2.00%) - 7 (14.00%)

Speakers are not clearly identified and/or they have fewer than 10 lines each.

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%)

Style

Points Range:5 (10.00%) - 5 (10.00%)

Document is free from errors. Grammatical errors are consistent with appropriate speech patterns.

Points Range:4 (8.00%) - 4 (8.00%)

There are few grammatical errors.

Points Range:3 (6.00%) - 3 (6.00%)

Typographical or grammatical errors detract from the content.

Points Range:1 (2.00%) - 2 (4.00%)

Errors significantly detract from the presentation.

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%)