I Need Help In Manufacturing System. I Attached The Assignment

profilesq5zv
Exam2-REVIEWQUESTIONS.docx

IE 470- Manufacturing Systems

EXAM 2- REVIEW QUESTIONS

CHAPTER 16:

Automated Production Lines with No Internal Storage

16.1 A rotary worktable is driven by a Geneva mechanism with five slots. The driver rotates at 48 rev/min. Determine (a) the cycle time, (b) available process time, and (c) indexing time each cycle.

Solution: (a) Tc = = = 0.020833 min = 1.25 sec

(b) = = 72 To = = 0.01458333 min = 0.875 sec

(c) Tr = = 0.00625 min = 0.375 sec

16.2 A Geneva with six slots is used to operate the worktable of a dial-indexing machine. The slowest workstation on the dial-indexing machine has an operation time of 2.5 sec, so the table must be in a dwell position for this length of time. (a) At what rotational speed must the driven member of the Geneva mechanism be turned to provide this dwell time? (b) What is the indexing time each cycle?

Solution: (a) = 360/6 = 60 To = = = 2.5 sec (given)

N = = 0.2667 rev/sec = 16 rev/min

(b) Tr = = 1.25 sec

16.3 Solve the previous problem except that the Geneva has eight slots.

Solution: (a) = 360/8 = 45 To = = 0.62/N = 2.5 sec (given)

N = 0.625/2.5 = 0.25 rev/sec = 15 rev/min

(b) Tr = = 1.50 sec

16.4 A ten-station transfer machine has an ideal cycle time of 30 sec. The frequency of line stops is 0.075 stops per cycle. When a line stop occurs, the average downtime is 4.0 min. Determine (a) average production rate in pc/hr, (b) line efficiency, and (c) proportion downtime.

Solution: (a) Tp = 0.5 + 0.075(4) = 0.5 + 0.3 = 0.8 min

Rp = 1/0.8 = 1.25 pc/min = 75 pc/hr

(b) E = 0.5/0.8 = 0.625 = 62.5%

(c) D = 0.3/0.8 = 0.375 = 37.5%

16.5 Cost elements associated with the operation of the ten-station transfer line in Problem 16.4 are as follows: raw workpart cost = $0.55/pc, line operating cost = $42.00/hr, and cost of disposable tooling = $0.27/pc. Compute the average cost of a workpiece produced.

Solution: Refers to Problem 16.4: Cpc = 0.55 + 42(0.8)/60 + 0.27 = 0.55 + 0.56 + 0.27 = $1.38/pc

16.6 In Problem 16.4, the line stop occurrences are due to random mechanical and electrical failures on the line. Suppose that in addition to these reasons for downtime, that the tools at each workstation on the line must be changed and/or reset every 150 cycles. This procedure takes a total of 12.0 min for all ten stations. Include this additional data to determine (a) average production rate in pc/hr, (b) line efficiency, and (c) proportion downtime.

Solution: Refers to Problem 16.4:

(a) F1Td1 = 0.075(4.0) = 0.3 min

F2Td2 = 12.00/150 = 0.08 min

Tp = 0.5 + 0.3 + 0.08 = 0.88 min

Rp = 1/0.88 = 1.13636 pc/min = 68.2 pc/hr

(b) E = 0.5/0.88 = 0.5682 = 56.82%,

(c) D = 0.38/0.88 = 0.4318 = 43.18%

16.7 The dial indexing machine of Problem 16.2 experiences a breakdown frequency of 0.06 stops/cycle. The average downtime per breakdown is 3.5 min. Determine (a) average production rate in pc/hr and (b) line efficiency.

Solution: Refers to Problem 16.2:

(a) From Problem 16.2, Tc = To + Tr = 2.5 + 1.25 = 3.75 sec

Tp = 3.75/60 + 0.06(3.5) = 0.0625 + 0.021 = 0.2725 min

Rp = 1/0.2725 = 3.67 pc/min = 220.2 pc/hr

(b) E = 0.0625/0.2725 = 0.2294 = 22.94%

16.8 In the operation of a certain 15-station transfer line, the ideal cycle time = 0.58 min. Breakdowns occur at a rate of once every 20 cycles, and the average downtime per breakdown is 9.2 min. The transfer line is located in a plant that works an 8-hr day, 5 days per week. Determine (a) line efficiency, and (b) how many parts will the transfer line produce in a week?

Solution: (a) Tp = 0.58 + 9.2/20 = 0.58 + 0.46 = 1.04 min

E = 0.58/1.04 = 0.5577 = 55.77%

(b) Rp = 60/1.04 = 57.69 pc/hr Weekly production = 40(57.69) = 2307.7 pc/wk.

16.9 A 22-station in-line transfer machine has an ideal cycle time of 0.35 min. Station breakdowns occur with a probability of 0.01. Assume that station breakdowns are the only reason for line stops. Average downtime = 8.0 min per line stop. Determine (a) ideal production rate, (b) frequency of line stops, (c) average actual production rate, and (d) line efficiency.

Solution: (a) Rc = = 2.857 pc/min = 171.4 pc/hr

(b) F = np = 22(0.01) = 0.22

(c) Tp = 0.35 + 0.22(8) = 0.35 + 1.76 = 2.11 min Rp = = 0.4739 pc/min = 28.44 pc/hr

(d) E = = 0.1659 = 16.59%

16.10 A ten-station rotary indexing machine performs nine machining operations at nine workstations, and the tenth station is used for loading and unloading parts. The longest process time on the line is 1.30 min and the loading/unloading operation can be accomplished in less time than this. It takes 9.0 sec to index the machine between workstations. Stations break down with a frequency of 0.007, which is considered equal for all ten stations. When these stops occur, it takes an average of 10.0 min to diagnose the problem and make repairs. Determine (a) line efficiency and (b) average actual production rate.

Solution: (a) F = np = 10(0.007) = 0.07

Tc = 1.30 + 0.15 = 1.45 min

Tp = 1.45 + 0.07(10) = 1.45 + 0.7 = 2.15 min/pc

E = 1.45/2.15 = 0.674 = 67.4%

(b) Rp = 1/2.15 = 0.465 pc/min = 27.9 pc/hr

16.11 A transfer machine has six stations that function as follows:

Station

Operation

Process time

pi

1

Load part

0.78 min

0

2

Drill three holes

1.25 min

0.02

3

Ream two holes

0.90 min

0.01

4

Tap two holes

0.85 min

0.04

5

Mill flats

1.32 min

0.01

6

Unload parts

0.45 min

0

In addition, transfer time = 0.18 min. Average downtime per occurrence = 8.0 min. A total of 20,000 parts must be processed through the transfer machine. Determine (a) proportion downtime, (b) average actual production rate, and (c) how many hours of operation are required to produce the 20,000 parts.

Solution: (a) Tc = 1.32 + 0.18 = 1.50 min

F = 0.02 + 0.01 + 0.04 + 0.01 = 0.08

Tp = 1.50 + 0.08(8.0) = 1.50 + 0.64 = 2.14 min

D = 0.64/2.14 = 0.299 = 29.9%

(b) Rp = 1/2.14 = 0.467 pc/min = 28.04 pc/hr

(c) H = 20,000(2.14/60) = 713.3 hr

16.12 The cost to operate a certain 20-station transfer line is $72/hr. The line operates with an ideal cycle time of 0.85 min. Downtime occurrences happen on average once per 14 cycles. Average downtime per occurrence is 9.5 min. It is proposed that a new computer system and associated sensors be installed to monitor the line and diagnose downtime occurrences when they happen. It is anticipated that this new system will reduce downtime from its present value to 7.5 min. If the cost of purchasing and installing the new system is $15,000, how many units must the system produce in order for the savings to pay for the computer system?

Solution: Current operation: Tp = 0.85 + = 0.85 + 0.6786 = 1.5286 min/pc

Cpc = ($72.00/hr)(1.5286/60) - $1.834/pc.

With computer system: Tp = 0.85 + = 0.85 + 0.5357 = 1.3857 min/pc

Cpc = ($72.00/hr)(1.3857/60) - $1.663/pc

15,000 = (1.834 - 1.663) Q = 0.171 Q Q = 15,000/0.171 = 87,719 pc

16.13 A 23-station transfer line has been logged for 5 days (total time = 2400 min). During this time there were a total of 158 downtime occurrences on the line. The accompanying table identifies the type of downtime occurrence, how many occurrences of each type, and how much total time was lost for each type. The transfer line performs a sequence of machining operations, the longest of which takes 0.42 min. The transfer mechanism takes 0.08 min to index the parts from one station to the next each cycle. Assuming no parts removal when the line jams, determine the following based on the five-day observation period: (a) how many parts were produced, (b) downtime proportion, (c) production rate, and (d) frequency rate associated with the transfer mechanism failures.

Type of downtime

Number of occurrences

Total time lost

Associated with stations:

Tool-related causes

Mechanical failures

Miscellaneous

104

21

7

520 min

189 min

84 min

Subtotal

132

793 min

Transfer mechanism

26

78 min

Totals

158

871 min

Solution: (a) Tc = 0.42 + .08 = 0.50 min

Td = (793 + 78)/158 = 5.513 min

QTp = QTc + QFTd = 2400 min = 0.5Q + 158Td

0.5Q + 158(5.513) = 2400 0.5Q = 2400 871 = 1529

Q = 1529/.5 = 3058 pc

(b) D = 871/2400 = 0.363 = 36.3%

(c) Tp = 2400 min/3058 pc = 0.785 min/pc, Rp = 60/.785 = 76.43 pc/hr

(d) Transfer mechanism breakdown frequency: p = 26/3058 = 0.0085 breakdowns/pc

16.14 An eight-station rotary indexing machine performs the machining operations shown in the accompanying table, together with processing times and breakdown frequencies for each station. The transfer time for the machine is 0.15 min per cycle. A study of the system was undertaken, during which time 2000 parts were completed. It was determined in this study that when breakdowns occur, it takes an average of 7.0 min to make repairs and get the system operating again. For the study period, determine (a) average actual production rate, (b) line uptime efficiency, and (c) how many hours were required to produce the 2000 parts.

Station

Process

Process time

Breakdowns

1

Load part

0.50 min

0

2

Mill top

0.85 min

22

3

Mill sides

1.10 min

31

4

Drill two holes

0.60 min

47

5

Ream two holes

0.43 min

8

6

Drill six holes

0.92 min

58

7

Tap six holes

0.75 min

84

8

Unload part

0.40 min

0

Solution: (a) Tc = 1.10 + 0.15 = 1.25 min/cycle,

Number of breakdowns = 0 + 22 + 31 + 47 + 8 + 58 + 84 + 0 = 250

F = 250/2000 = 0.125

Tp = 1.25 + 0.125(7.0) = 2.125 min/pc

Rp = 60/2.125 = 28.2353 pc/hr

(b) E = 1.25/2.125 = 0.588 = 58.8%

(c) Total time = 2000(1.25) + 250(7) = 4250 min = 70.83 hr

16.15 A 14-station transfer line has been logged for 2400 min to identify type of downtime occurrence, how many occurrences, and time lost. The results are presented in the table below. The ideal cycle time for the line is 0.50 min, including transfer time between stations. Determine (a) how many parts were produced during the 2400 min, (b) line uptime efficiency, (c) average actual production rate per hour, and (d) frequency p associated with transfer system failures.

Type of occurrence

Number

Time lost

Tool changes and failures

70

400 min

Station failures: (mechanical and electrical)

45

300 min

Transfer system failures

25

150 min

Solution: Total downtime = 400 + 300 + 150 = 850 min

Number of downtime occurrences = 70 + 45 + 25 = 140 occurrences

(a) Total uptime = 2400 850 = 1550 min

Number of parts = (1550 min)/(0.50 min/pc) = 3100 pc

(b) E = 1550/2400 = 0.646 = 64.6%

(c) Rp = (3100 pc/2400 min)(60) = 77.5 pc/hr

(d) Transfer system failures: p = 25/3100 = 0.008065

16.16 A transfer machine has a mean time between failures (MTBF) = 50 minutes and a mean time to repair (MTTR) = 9 minutes. If the ideal cycle rate = 1/min (when the machine is running), what is the average hourly production rate?

Solution: Tc = 1/Rc = 1 min/cycle = 1.0 min/pc.

Availability A = = 0.82 E = A = 0.82 = 82%

E = Tc/Tp, therefore Tp = Tc/E = 1.0/0.82 = 1.2195 min/pc

Rp = 1/1.2195 = 0.82 pc/min = 49.2 pc/hr

16.17 A part is to be produced on an automated transfer line. The total work content time to make the part is 36 minutes, and this work will be divided evenly amongst the workstations, so that the processing time at each station is 36/n, where n = the number of stations. In addition, the time required to transfer parts between workstations is 6 seconds. Thus, the cycle time = 0.1 + 36/n minutes. In addition, it is known that the station breakdown frequency will be 0.005, and that the average downtime per breakdown = 8.0 minutes. (a) Given these data, determine the number of workstations that should be included in the line to maximize production rate. Also, what is the (b) production rate and (c) line efficiency for this number of stations?

Solution: (a) Tc = 0.1 + 36/n

FTd = pnTd = 0.005n(8.0) = 0.04n

Tp = 0.1 + 36/n + 0.04n

, rearranging,

n2 = 36/0.04 = 900 n = 30 stations

(b) Tp = 0.1 + 36/30 + 0.04(30) = 0.1 + 1.2 + 1.2 = 2.5 min/pc.

Rp = 1/2.5 = 0.4 pc/min = 24 pc/hr

(c) E = (0.1 + 1.2)/2.5 = 1.3/2.5 = 0.52 = 52%

Automated Production Lines with Storage Buffers

16.18 A 30-station transfer line has an ideal cycle time of 0.75 min, an average downtime of 6.0 min per line stop occurrence, and a station failure frequency of 0.01 for all stations. A proposal has been submitted to locate a storage buffer between stations 15 and 16 to improve line efficiency. Determine (a) the current line efficiency and production rate, and (b) the maximum possible line efficiency and production rate that would result from installing the storage buffer.

Solution: (a) Tp = 0.75 + 30(0.01)(6.0) = 0.75 + 1.8 = 2.55 min/pc

E = 0.75/2.55 = 0.2941 = 29.41%

Rp = 1/2.55 = 0.392 pc/min = 23.53 pc/hr

(b) Tp1 = Tp2 = 0.75 + 15(0.01)(6.0) = 0.75 + 0.90 = 1.65 min/pc.

E = 0.75/1.65 = 0.4545 = 45.45%

Rp = 1/1.65 = 0.6061 pc/min = 36.36 pc/hr

16.19 Given the data in Problem 16.18, solve the problem except that (a) the proposal is to divide the line into three stages, that is, with two storage buffers located between stations 10 and 11, and between stations 20 and 21, respectively; and (b) the proposal is to use an asynchronous line with large storage buffers between every pair of stations on the line; that is a total of 29 storage buffers.

Solution: (a) Tp1 = Tp2 = Tp3 = 0.75 + 10(0.01)(6.0) = 0.75 + 0.60 = 1.35 min/pc

For each stage, E = 0.75/1.65 = 0.5555 = 55.55%

Rp = 1/1.35 = 0.7407 pc/min = 44.44 pc/hr

(b) Tp1 = Tp2 = . . . = Tp29 = 0.75 + 0.01(6.0) = 0.75 + 0.06 = 0.81 min/pc

For each stage, E = 0.75/0.81 = 0.926 = 92.6%

Rp = 1/0.81 = 1.235 pc/min = 74.1 pc/hr

16.20 In Problem 16.18, if the capacity of the proposed storage buffer is to be 20 parts, determine (a) line efficiency, and (b) production rate of the line. Assume that the downtime (Td = 6.0 min) is a constant.

Solution: From previous Problem 16.18, Eo = 0.2941 and E = 0.4545

= 0.3529, r = = 1.0

= = 8.0. If b = 20, then B = 2 and L = 4 in Eq. (16.27)

h(20) = = = 0.7083

E = 0.2941 + 0.3529(0.7083)(0.4545) = 0.4077 = 40.77%

(b) Rp = = = 0.5436 pc/min = 32.62 pc/hr

16.21 Solve Problem 16.20 but assume that the downtime (Td = 6.0 min) follows the geometric repair distribution.

Solution: From previous Problem 16.20, Eo = 0.2941 and E = 0.4545

D’1 = = 0.3529, r = = 1.0

h(20) = = = 0.5714

E = 0.2941 + 0.3529(0.5714)(0.4545) = 0.3858 = 38.58%

(b) Rp = = = 0.5143 pc/min = 30.86 pc/hr

16.22 In the transfer line of Problems 16.20 and 16.22, suppose it is more technically feasible to locate the storage buffer between stations 11 and 12, rather than between stations 15 and 16. Determine (a) the maximum possible line efficiency and production rate that would result from installing the storage buffer, and (b) the line efficiency and production rate for a storage buffer with a capacity of 20 parts. Assume that downtime (Td = 6.0 min) is a constant.

Solution: F1 = 11(0.01) = 0.11, Tp1 = 0.75 + 0.11(6.0) = 0.75 + 0.66 = 1.41 min/pc

F2 = 19(0.01) = 0.19, Tp2 = 0.75 + 0.19(6.0) = 0.75 + 1.14 = 1.89 min/pc

E = Min{E1, E2 } = Min{(0.75/1.41), (0.75/1.89)} = Min{0.5319, 0.3968} = 0.3968

Rp = 0.3968/0.75 = 0.5291 pc/min = 31.74 pc/hr

(b) Eo = 0.75/2.55 = 0.2941, D’1 = 0.66/2.55 = 0.2588, E2 = 0.75/1.89 = 0.3968

r = = = 0.5789, = = 8.0, If b = 20, then B = 2 and L = 4

h(20) = + = 0.4776 + 0.0241 = 0.5017

E = 0.2941 + 0.2588(0.5017)(0.4545) = 0.3531 = 35.31%

Rp = 0.3531/0.75 = 0.4708 pc/min = 28.25 pc/hr

16.23 A proposed synchronous transfer line will have 20 stations and will operate with an ideal cycle time of 0.5 min. All stations are expected to have an equal probability of breakdown, p = 0.01. The average downtime per breakdown is expected to be 5.0. An option under consideration is to divide the line into two stages, each stage having 10 stations, with a buffer storage zone between the stages. It has been decided that the storage capacity should be 20 units. The cost to operate the line is $96.00/hr. Installing the storage buffer would increase the line operating cost by $12.00/hr. Ignoring material and tooling costs, determine (a) line efficiency, production rate, and unit cost for the one-stage configuration, and (b) line efficiency, production rate, and unit cost for the optional two-stage configuration.

Solution: (a) For the current line operation: Tp = 0.5 + 20(.01)(5) = 1.5 min

E = 0.5/1.5 = 0.333 = 33.3%

Rp = 60/1.5 = 40 pc/hr

Cpc = 20(4.80)/40 = $2.40/pc

(b) For the proposed twostage line: Td/Tc = 10, b = 20: B = 2, L = 0

F1 = F2 = 10(0.01) = 0.10, r = 0.1/0.1 = 1.0

h(25) = 2/3 = 0.6667

Eo = 0.5/1.5 = 0.3333, E2 = 0.5/1.0 = 0.5, and D’1 = = 0.3333

E = .3333 + .3333(.6667)(.5) = 0.4444

Tp = 0.5/0.4444 = 1.125 min, Rp = 60/1.125 = 53.33 pc/hr

Cpc = (20x4.80 + 12.00)/53.333 = $2.025/pc

16.24 A two-week study has been performed on a 12-station transfer line that is used to partially machine engine heads for a major automotive company. During the 80 hours of observation, the line was down a total of 42 hours, and a total of 1689 parts were completed. The accompanying table lists the machining operation performed at each station, the process times, and the downtime occurrences for each station. Transfer time between stations is 6 sec. To address the downtime problem, it has been proposed to divide the line into two stages, each consisting of six stations. The storage buffer between the stages would have a storage capacity of 20 parts. Determine (a) line efficiency and production rate of current one-stage configuration, and (b) line efficiency and production rate of proposed two-stage configuration. (c) Given that the line is to be divided into two stages, should each stage consist of six stations as proposed, or is there a better division of stations into stages? Support your answer.

Station

Operation

Process time

Downtime occurrences

1

Load part (manual)

0.50 min

0

2

Rough mill top

1.10 min

15

3

Finish mill top

1.25 min

18

4

Rough mill sides

0.75 min

23

5

Finish mill sides

1.05 min

31

6

Mill surfaces for drill

0.80 min

9

7

Drill two holes

0.75 min

22

8

Tap two holes

0.40 min

47

9

Drill three holes

1.10 min

30

10

Ream three holes

0.70 min

21

11

Tap three holes

0.45 min

30

12

Unload and inspect part (manual)

0.90 min

0

Totals:

9.40 min

246

Solution: (a) Tc = 1.25 + 0.1 = 1.35 min/cycle = 1.35 min/pc.

Td = = 10.244 min/occurrence, F = = 0.1456

Tp = 1.35 + 0.1456(10.244) = 1.35 + 1.492 = 2.842 min/pc.

Rp = 1/2.842 = 0.352 pc/min = 21.11 pc/hr

Eo = 1.35/2.842 = 0.475 = 47.5%

(b) Stage 1: Tc = 1.25 + 0.1 = 1.35 min/cycle = 1.35 min/pc.

Assume Td = 10.244 min/occurrence, as above, for both stages.

F1 = (15 + 18 + 23 + 31 + 9)/1689 = 96/1689 = 0.0568

Tp1 = 1.35 + 0.0568(10.244) = 1.35 + 0.582 = 1.932 min/pc.

Rp1 = 1/1.932 = 0.5175 pc/min = 31.052 pc/hr E1 = 1.35/1.932 = 0.6988 = 69.88%

Stage 2: Tc = 1.10 + 0.1 = 1.20 min/pc. Assume Td = 10.244 min/occurrence, as above.

F2 = (27 + 47 + 30 + 21 + 25)/1689 = 150/1689 = 0.0888

Tp2 = 1.20 + 0.888(10.244) = 1.20 + 0.91 = 2.11 min/pc.

Rp2 = 1/2.11 = 0.474 pc/min = 28.44 pc/hr E2 = 1.20/2.11 = 0.5687 = 56.87%

D’1 = = 0.2048 r = = = 0.6396

Since Tc1 Tc2 , use average value in the calculations: Tc = = 1.275 min

= = 8.03 B = 2 and L = 3.93

h(20) = +

h(20) = 0.5119 + 0.0271 = 0.5390

E = 0.4750 + 0.2048(0.5390)(0.5687) = 0.5378

Rp = 0.5378/1.275 = 0.4219 pc/min = 25.31 pc/hr

(c) A better separation into stages would equalize E and Rp values between the two stages. Try dividing the line between stations 7 and 8 rather than between 6 and 7.

Stage 1: Tc = 1.35 min F1 = (96 + 22)/1689 = 118/1689 = 0.0699

Assume Td = 10.244 min/occurrence, as above, for both stages

Tp1 = 1.35 + 0.0699(10.244) = 1.35 + 0.7157 = 2.066 min/pc

Rp1 = 1/2.066 = 0.4841 pc/min = 29.05 pc/hr E1 = 1.35/2.066 = 0.6534 = 65.34%

Stage 2: Tc = 1.20 min F2 = (150 - 22)/1689 = 128/1689 = 0.0758

Tp2 = 1.20 + 0.0758(10.244) = 1.976 min/pc

Rp2 = 1.1.976 = 0.506 pc/min = 30.36 pc/hr E2 = 1.20/1.976 = 0.6073 = 60.73%

D’1 = = 0.2518. r = = = 0.9222

Again, since Tc1 Tc2 , use average value in the calculations: Tc = = 1.275 min

= = 8.03 B = 2 and L = 3.93.

h(20) = +

h(20) = 0.6393 + 0.0389 = 0.6782

E = 0.4750 + 0.2518(0.6782)(0.6073) = 0.5787

Rp = 0.5787/1.275 = 0.4539 pc/min = 27.23 pc/hr

16.25 In Problem 16.24, the current line has an operating cost of $66.00/hr. The starting workpart is a casting that costs $4.50/pc. Disposable tooling costs $1.25/pc. The proposed storage buffer will add $6.00/hr to the operating cost of the line. Does the improvement in production rate justify this $20 increase?

Solution: Current line: Cpc = 4.50 + 66(2.842/60) + 1.25 = $8.88/pc.

Two stage line in which division into stages is between stations 6 and 7:

Cpc = 4.50 + 72/25.31 + 1.25 = $8.59/pc.

Two stage line in which division into stages is between stations 7 and 8. See solution of Problem 16.24(c):

Cpc = 4.50 + 72/27.23 + 1.25 = $8.39/pc.

Improvement is justified for either division.

16.26 A 16-station transfer line can be divided into two stages by installing a storage buffer between stations 8 and 9. The probability of failure at any station is 0.01. The ideal cycle time is 1.0 min and the downtime per line stop is 10.0 min. These values are applicable for both the one-stage and two-stage configurations. The downtime should be a considered constant value. The cost of installing the storage buffer is a function of its capacity. This cost function is Cb = $0.60b/hr = $0.01b/min, where b = the buffer capacity. However, the buffer can only be constructed to store increments of 10 (in other words, b can take on values of 10, 20, 30, etc.). The cost to operate the line itself is $120/hr. Ignore material and tooling costs. Based on cost per unit of product, determine the buffer capacity b that will minimize unit product cost.

Solution: With no buffer storage (b = 0): Tp = 1.0 + 16(.01)(10) = 2.6 min/pc

Cpc = 120(2.6/60) = 2.00(2.6) = $5.20/pc, Eo = 1/2.6 = 0.3846

With two stages, each stage would operate the same way, with n = 8 stations

Tp = 1.0 + 8(0.01)(10) = 1.8 min/pc

E1 = E2 = 1/1.8 = 0.5555

D1' = (8x0.01x10)/(1+16x0.01x10) = 0.3077

h(b) = , b = 10, 20, 30, 40, etc. B = 1, 2, 3, 4, etc.

Buffer cost = 0.1B/min, CL = (2.0 + 0.1B)/min

E = 0.3846 + = 0.3846 + =

Tp = Tc/E. Cpc = CLTp = CLTc/E

Using these terms for E, Tp and Cpc, Cpc = (2.0 + 0.1B)

B = 0 Cpc = (2.0+.1x0)(0+1)/.3846 = $5.20/pc

B = 1 Cpc = (2.0+.1x1)(1+1)/.9401 = $4.468/pc

B = 2 Cpc = (2.0+.1x2)(2+1)/1.4956 = $4.413/pc

B = 3 Cpc = (2.0+.1x3)(3+1)/2.0511 = $4.485/pc

B = 4 Cpc = (2.0+.1x4)(4+1)/2.6066 = $4.604/pc

B = 5 Cpc = (2.0+.1x5)(5+1)/3.1621 = $4.744/pc

Lowest cost is at B = 2 or b = 20 unit capacity

16.27 The uptime efficiency of a 20 station automated production line is only 40%. The ideal cycle time is 48 sec, and the average downtime per line stop occurrence is 3.0 min. Assume the frequency of breakdowns for all stations is equal (pi = p for all stations) and that the downtime is constant. To improve uptime efficiency, it is proposed to install a storage buffer with a 15-part capacity for $14,000. The present production cost is $4.00 per unit, ignoring material and tooling costs. How many units would have to be produced in order for the $14,000 investment to pay for itself?

Solution: F = np = 20p Tp = Tc + 20pTd

Tp = Tc/E = 0.8/0.4 = 2.0 min/pc.

2.0 = 0.8 + 20p(3) = 0.8 + 60p

60p = 2.0 0.8 = 1.2 p = 1.2/60 = 0.02

Cpc = CLTp = $4.00 = CL(2.0), CL = $2.00/min

Two stage line each with 10 stations: Eo = 0.4

E2 = 0.8/(.8+10x.02x3) = 0.8/1.4 = 0.5714

D’1 = 0.6/2.0 = 0.3

With constant repair time, b = 15 B = 4, L = 0 and h(b) = h(15) = 4/(4+1) = 0.8

E = 0.4 + 0.3(0.8)(0.5714) = .5371

Tp = Tc/E = 0.8/0.5371 = 1.4895 min

Cpc = 2.00(1.4895) = 2.979/pc

Breakeven point Q: 4.00Q = 14,000 + 2.979Q

(4.00 2.979)Q = 14,000

1.021Q = 14,000 Q = 13,712 pc

16.28 An automated transfer line is divided into two stages with a storage buffer between them. Each stage consists of 9 stations. The ideal cycle time of each stage = 1.0 minute, and frequency of failure for each station is 0.01. The average downtime per stop is 8.0 minutes, and a constant downtime distribution should be assumed. Determine the required capacity of the storage buffer such that the improvement in line efficiency E compared to a zero buffer capacity would be 80% of the improvement yielded by a buffer with infinite capacity.

Solution: For b = 0, F = 18(0.01) = 0.18

Tp = 1.0 + 0.18(8.0) = 1.0 + 1.44 = 2.44 min/pc.

Eo = 1.0/2.44 = 0.4098

For B = , F = 9(0.01) = 0.09

Tp = 1.0 + 0.09(8.0) = 1.0 + 0.72 = 1.72 min/pc.

E = 1.0/1.72 = 0.5814 E1 = E2 = 0.5814

E = 0.5814 - 0.4098 = 0.1716

80% of E = 0.80(0.1716) = 0.1373

E = 0.4098 + 0.1373 = 0.5471 = E at 80% improvement

Eb = Eo + D’1 h(b)E2, so D’1 h(b)E2 = 0.1373

D’1 = 0.72/2.44 = 0.2951

0.1373 = 0.2951(h(b)) (0.5814) h(b) = = 0.80

r = = 1.0, therefore h(b) = +

For ease of calculations, ignore the second term. If B turns out to be an integer, the second term does not apply. If B is not an integer, a trial and error solution will be required to find B and L.

h(b) = 0.80 = 0.80(B+1) = B 0.80 B + 0.80 = B 0.80 = 0.20 B

B = 4 b = B = 4(8/1) = 32 = buffer capacity

16.29 In Problem 16.17, suppose that a twostage line were to be designed, with an equal number of stations in each stage. Work content time will be divided evenly between the two stages. The storage buffer between the stages will have a capacity = 3 Td/Tc. Assume a constant repair distribution. (a) For this two-stage line, determine the number of workstations that should be included in each stage of the line to maximize production rate. (b) What is the production rate and line efficiency for this line configuration? (c) What is the buffer storage capacity?

Solution: (a) Given from Problem 16.17: p = 0.005, Td = 8.0 min For one stage, Twc = 18 min

Tc = 0.1 + Tp = 0.1 + + 0.005n(8.0) = 0.1 + + 0.04n

= + 0.04 = 0 n2 = 18/0.04 = 450 n = 21.2, use n = 21 stations

(b) Tc = 0.1 + 18/21 = 0.9571 min/pc

Tp = 0.9571 + 0.005(21)(8) = 1.7971 min/pc for each stage.

Eb = Eo + D’1 h(b) E2

E2 = 0.9571/1.7971 = 0.5326 D’1 = = 0.3185

Given b = 3, then B = 3 and L = 0 h(b) = = 3/4 = 0.75

Eo = = 0.3629

Eb = 0.3629 + 0.3185(0.75)(0.5326) = 0.4901

Rp = 0.4901/0.9571 = 0.5121 pc/min = 30.73 pc/hr

(c) b = 3 = 3 = 25.07 use b = 25 buffer capacity

16.30 A 20station transfer line presently operates with a line efficiency E = 1/3. The ideal cycle time = 1.0 min. The repair distribution is geometric with an average downtime per occurrence = 8 min, and each station has an equal probability of failure. It is possible to divide the line into two stages with 10 stations each, separating the stages by a storage buffer of capacity b. With the information given, determine the required value of b that will increase the efficiency from E = 1/3 to E = 2/5.

Solution: E = 1/3 = 0.3333, Tp = Tc/E = 1.0/0.3333 = 3.0 min/pc

Tp = Tc + npTd = 1.0 + 20p(8.0) = 1.0 + 160p = 3.0

160p = 3.0 - 1.0 = 2.0 p = 2/160 = 0.0125

Two stage line: Eb = Eo + D’1 h(b) E2

Given E0 = 0.3333 D’1 = = 0.3333 E2 = = 0.50

Use Eq. (16.29): h(b) = = =

Eb = 0.3333 + 0.3333 ()(0.50)

Target E = 2/5 = 0.40 = 0.3333 + 0.1667()

0.40 - 0.3333 = 0.0667 = 0.1667()

= = 0.40

0.4(1.875 + 0.125b) = 0.125b

0.75 + 0.05b = 0.125b

0.75 = 0.075b b = 10 pc buffer capacity

FLOW SHOP and JOB SHOP SCHEDULING

1. Check the problems that we solved in class.

0

7157

2.

842

.

0

0699

0

0758

.

.

0

9222

1

0

9222

1

0

9222

2

3

.

(

.

)

.

)

-

-

360

5

3

93

1

275

10

244

0

9222

1

0

9222

1

0

9222

1

0

9222

3

2

3

4

.

.

.

.

(

.

)

(

.

)(

.

)

æ

è

ç

ö

ø

÷

-

-

-

1

B

B

+

0.3077(0.5555)

1

B

B

æö

ç÷

+

èø

0.1709

1

B

B

æö

ç÷

+

èø

0.55550.3846

1

B

B

+

+

1

0.55550.3846

B

B

+

æö

ç÷

+

èø

0

1373

0

2951

0

5814

.

(

.

)(

.

)

1

(1)(2)

c

d

T

L

TBB

æö

ç÷

++

èø

)

48

(

360

72

180

+

18

n

p

dT

dn

2

18

n

-

0

005

21

8)

0

9571

0

005

42

8)

.

(

)(

.

.

(

)(

+

0

9571

0

9571

0

005

42

8)

.

.

.

(

)(

+

8

0

0

9571

.

.

æ

è

ç

ö

ø

÷

10(

0

0125

8)

1

0

20(

0

0125

8)

.

)(

.

.

)(

+

)

48

(

360

72

180

-

1

0

1

0

10(

0

0125

8)

.

.

.

)(

+

(1/8)

2(1)(1/8)

b

b

+-

0.125

20.125(1)

b

b

+-

0.125

1.8750.125

b

b

+

0

0667

0

1667

.

.

N

360

60

360

+

N

667

.

0

0

667

2.

5

.

sec.

)

2667

.

0

(

360

60

180

-

N

360

45

360

+

)

25

.

0

(

360

45

180

-

11

0.35

c

T

=

1

2.

11

0

35

2.

11

.

1

14

9.

5

(

)

1

14

7.

5

(

)

509

50

MTBFMTTR

MTBF

--

=

2

36

0.040

p

dT

dn

n

-

=+=

2

36

0.04

n

=

'

1

15(0.01)(6.0)

2.55

D

=

1

2

F

F

d

c

T

T

6

0

0

75

.

.

2

2

1

4

0

75

6

0

1

2

1

2

2

+

+

æ

è

ç

ö

ø

÷

+

+

æ

è

ç

ö

ø

÷

.

.

(

)(

)

2

3

4

8

1

12

+

æ

è

ç

ö

ø

÷

c

E

T

0

4077

0

75

.

.

15

0

01

6

0)

2.

55

(

.

)(

.

20(

0

75

6

0)

2

20

1

0

75

6

0)

.

/

.

(

)(

.

/

.

+

-

2.

5

4.

375

0

3858

0

75

.

.

N

1

0

11

0

19

.

.

6

0

0

75

.

.

0

5789

1

0

5789

1

0

5789

2

3

.

.

.

-

-

4

0

75

6

0

0

5789

1

0

5789

1

0

5789

1

0

5789

3

2

3

4

.

.

.

(

.

)

(

.

)(

.

)

æ

è

ç

ö

ø

÷

-

-

-

0

01

10(

10)

1

5

.

(

.

42

60)

246

(

246

1689

0

582

2.

842

.

1

48

0

0568

0

0888

.

.

1

35

1

20

2

.

.

+

10

244

1

275

.

.

0

6396

1

0

6396

1

0

6396

2

3

.

(

.

)

.

)

-

-

3

93

1

275

10

244

0

6396

1

0

6396)

1

0

6396

1

0

6396

3

2

3

4

.

.

.

.

(

.

(

.

)(

.

)

æ

è

ç

ö

ø

÷

-

-

-