Effective Questioning Strategies

profileRoyce0615
EffectiveQuestioningStrategiesRubric_Print_Format1.xlsx

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code
ELM-560 ELM-560-O501 Effective Questioning Strategies 60.0
Criteria Percentage No Submission (0.00%) Insufficient (69.00%) Approaching (74.00%) Acceptable (87.00%) Target (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Content 100.0%
COE Lesson Plan Template 20.0% Not addressed. Uses the COE Lesson Plan Template and Class Profile. Lesson plan components are missing or are inadequately addressed. Uses the COE Lesson Plan Template and Class Profile. All lesson plan components are addressed. Details are minimal or irrelevant. Uses the COE Lesson Plan Template and Class profile. All lesson plan components are clearly addressed in the design of an original lesson plan. Uses the COE Lesson Plan Template and Class Profile. All lesson plan components are fully and thoroughly addressed in the design of a thoughtful and original lesson plan.
Probing Questions 30.0% Not addressed. Template includes examples of questions that vaguely connect concepts, procedures and applications from algebra, do not activate prior knowledge for the lesson, and weakly encourage exploration problem-solving. Questions are not aligned to math standard. Template includes underdeveloped examples of questions that connect concepts, procedures and applications from algebra, activate prior knowledge for the lesson, and encourage exploration problem-solving. Questions are marginally aligned to math standard. Template includes clear and adequate examples of questions that directly connect concepts, procedures and applications from algebra, activate prior knowledge for the lesson, and encourage exploration problem-solving. Questions are directly aligned to math standard. Template includes specific and exemplary questions that insightfully connect concepts, procedures and applications from algebra, thoughtfully activate prior knowledge for the lesson, and highly encourage exploration problem-solving. Questions are proficiently aligned to math standard.
Reflection 20.0% Not addressed. Reflection includes a poor and unrelated rationale of questioning strategies in classroom instruction. Reflection includes an inadequate explanation as to how questioning strategies guide in determining appropriateness of instructional resources and materials. Reflection includes a brief rationale of questioning strategies in classroom instruction, with a minimal explanation as to how they encourage exploration and problem solving. Superficial explanation as to how questioning strategies guide in determining appropriateness of instructional resources and materials is provided. Reflection includes a sufficient rationale of questioning strategies to build on prior instruction, encourage student exploration and problem solving. Clear and detailed explanation as to how questioning strategies guide in determining appropriateness of instructional resources and materials is provided. Reflection includes a proficient rationale of questioning strategies to build on prior instruction, encourage student exploration and problem solving. Thorough and skillful explanation as to how questioning strategies guide in determining appropriateness of instructional resources and materials is provided.
Research Citations and Format 15.0% Not addressed. Many citations are missing where needed; or many of the sources are inappropriate for the submission; or APA is attempted where required, but many aspects are missing or mistaken. Some citations may be missing where needed; or some of the sources do not support the submission; or APA is attempted where required, but some aspects are missing or mistaken. All sources are credible, adequate, and support the submission. All required aspects of APA format are correct within the submission. All sources are credible, appropriate, and strongly support the submission. All required aspects of APA format are correct within the submission.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 15.0% Not addressed. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent language or word choice is present. Sentence structure is lacking. Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. A variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.
Total Weightage 100%