Spa management

profilecumat1y
DiscussionPostRubric1.pdf3.pdf

Online Discussion Rubric

Levels of Achievement

Criteria Excellent Good Fair Satisfactory Unsatisfactory

Introduction and Article Summary

5 to 6 points ➺ Well-developed introduction; grabs reader’s interest ➺ Thesis statement and position clearly stated

4 to 5 points ➺ Introduction creates interest ➺ Thesis states position

3 to 4 points ➺ Introduction adequately explains background; lacks detail ➺ Thesis states the position, but key elements are missing

2 to 3 points ➺ Introduction is unclear collection of information ➺ Thesis is vague and unclear

1 to 2 points

Critical Analysis

10 to 12 points ➺ Well-developed main points; topic sentences relate directly to thesis ➺ Supporting examples are concrete and detailed ➺ Analysis is developed with an effective point of view ➺ Critical issues are clearly identified, analyzed, and supported

8 to 10 points ➺ Most points relate to thesis, but some lack details ➺ Analysis Includes examples and evidence, but could use more descriptive language ➺ Critical issues are partially identified, analyzed, and supported

6 to 8 points ➺ Most points present, but lack details ➺ Little descriptive language is used ➺ Critical issues are not clearly identified, analyzed, or supported

4 to 6 points ➺ Most points poorly developed ➺ Critical issues are poorly identified, analyzed, or supported

0 to 4 points

Insights for Industry

6 to 8 points ➺ Recommendations, solutions, and/or plans of action provided

5 to 6 points ➺ Recommendations and/or plans of action partially provided

4 to 5 points ➺ Recommendations and/or plans of action inadequate

3 to 4 points

0 to 3 points ➺ Recommendations and/or plans of action not provided

Questions for Audience

5 to 6 points ➺ Provides insightful questions for audience

4 to 5 points ➺ Questions provide some insight for audience

3 to 4 points 2 to 3 points

0 to 2 points

Style and Organization, Spelling and Grammar

5 to 6 points ➺ Logical progression of ideas with a clear structure that enhances the thesis ➺ Transitions are effective and vary throughout the paragraph

4 to 5 points ➺ Logical progression of ideas ➺ Transitions are present, but lacks variety ➺ Writing is clear and sentences have varied structure

3 to 4 points ➺ Organization is clear ➺ Transitions are present at times, but there is very little variety ➺ Writing is clear, but could use a little more sentence variety

2 to 3 points ➺ Writing is not organized ➺ Transitions between ideas are unclear or non-existent

0 to 2 points

Name

Description

Rubric Detail

➺ Writing is smooth, skillful, and coherent ➺ Sentences are strong and expressive with varied structure ➺ Language is consistent and words are well chosen ➺ Punctuation, spelling, and grammar all correct. No errors

➺ Language is consistent ➺ Punctuation, spelling, and grammar mostly correct with few errors

to make the writing more interesting ➺ There are some errors in punctuation, spelling, and grammar

➺ Writing is confusing and hard to follow ➺ Contains fragments and/or run- on sentences ➺ Distracting errors in punctuation, spelling, and grammar

APA References

3.5 to 4 points 3 to 3.5 points 2 to 3 points 1.5 to 2 points

0 to 1.5 points

PrintPrint Close WindowClose Window

View Associated Items