Cybersecurity Design

profileRipple32
CYB-690-RS-SystemDesign-ScoringGuide.docx

CYB- 690 System Design Scoring Guide

Performance Level Ratings

Meets Expectations

Performance consistently met expectations in all essential areas of the assignment criteria, at times possibly exceeding expectations, and the quality of work overall was very good. The most critical goals were met.

Near Expectations

Performance did not consistently meet expectations. Performance failed to meet expectations in one or more essential areas of the assignment criteria, one or more of the most critical goals were not met.

Below Expectations

Performance was consistently below expectations in most essential areas of the assignment criteria, reasonable progress toward critical goals was not made. Significant improvement is needed in one or more important areas.

Criteria

Below Expectations

Near Expectations

Meets Expectations

Earned

The student comprehensively presents a system design document making sure to:

Describe the design goals and considerations.

0 pts – 6 pts

7 pts – 9 pts

10 pts

Provide a high-level overview of the system architecture.

0 pts – 6 pts

7 pts – 9 pts

10 pts

Describe the data design associated with the system.

0 pts – 9 pts

10 pts – 14 pts

15 pts

Describe the human-machine interface and operational scenarios.

0 pts – 6 pts

7 pts – 9 pts

10 pts

Design a drawing appropriate for implementation. The high-level system design should be further decomposed into low-level detailed design specifications for each system component, including hardware, internal communications, software, system integrity controls, and external interfaces.

0 pts – 9 pts

10 pts – 14 pts

15 pts

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures, figures of speech, and industry terminology.

0 pts – 2 pts

3 pts – 4 pts

5 pts

TOTAL

/65

Instructor Feedback

© 2019. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.