use the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist to critically evaluate one paper

profilejohnsmithhere
CASPqualitative.pdf

©Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Qualitative Research Checklist 31.05.13

1

10 questions to help you make sense of qualitative research

How to use this appraisal tool

Three broad issues need to be considered when appraising the report of a qualitative research:

 Are the results of the review valid?

 What are the results?

 Will the results help locally?

The 10 questions on the following pages are designed to help you think about these issues systematically.

The first two questions are screening questions and can be answered quickly. If the answer to both is

“yes”, it is worth proceeding with the remaining questions.

There is some degree of overlap between the questions, you are asked to record a “yes”, “no” or “can’t

tell” to most of the questions. A number of italicised prompts are given after each question. These are

designed to remind you why the question is important. Record your reasons for your answers in the

spaces provided.

These checklists were designed to be used as educational tools as part of a workshop setting

There will not be time in the small groups to answer them all in detail!

©CASP This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. To view

a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/. www.casp-uk.net

©Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Qualitative Research Checklist 31.05.13

2

Screening Questions

1. Was there a clear statement of the aims Yes Can’t tell No

of the research? HINT: Consider

 What was the goal of the research?

 Why it was thought important?

 Its relevance

2. Is a qualitative methodology appropriate? Yes Can’t tell No

HINT: Consider

 If the research seeks to interpret or illuminate the

actions and/or subjective experiences of research

participants

 Is qualitative research the right methodology for

addressing the research goal?

Is it worth continuing?

©Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Qualitative Research Checklist 31.05.13

3

Detailed questions

3. Was the research design appropriate to Yes Can’t tell  No

address the aims of the research?

HINT: Consider

 If the researcher has justified the research design

(e.g. have they discussed how they decided which

method to use)?

4. Was the recruitment strategy appropriate to the Yes Can’t tell No

aims of the research?

HINT:Consider

 If the researcher has explained how the participants

were selected

 If they explained why the participants they selected were

the most appropriate to provide access to the type of

knowledge sought by the study

 If there are any discussions around recruitment (e.g. why

some people chose not to take part)

©Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Qualitative Research Checklist 31.05.13

4

5. Was the data collected in a way that addressed Yes Can’t tell No

the research issue?

HINT: Consider

 If the setting for data collection was justified

 If it is clear how data were collected (e.g. focus group,

semi-structured interview etc.)

 If the researcher has justified the methods chosen

 If the researcher has made the methods explicit (e.g.

for interview method, is there an indication of how

interviews were conducted, or did they use a topic guide)?

 If methods were modified during the study. If so, has

the researcher explained how and why?

 If the form of data is clear (e.g. tape recordings, video

material, notes etc)

 If the researcher has discussed saturation of data

6. Has the relationship between researcher and Yes Can’t tell No participants been adequately considered? HINT: Consider

 If the researcher critically examined their own role,

potential bias and influence during

(a) Formulation of the research questions

(b) Data collection, including sample recruitment and

choice of location

 How the researcher responded to events during the study

and whether they considered the implications of any changes

in the research design

©Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Qualitative Research Checklist 31.05.13

5

7. Have ethical issues been taken into consideration? Yes Can’t tell No

HINT: Consider

 If there are sufficient details of how the research was explained

to participants for the reader to assess whether ethical standards

were maintained

 If the researcher has discussed issues raised by the study (e.g.

issues around informed consent or confidentiality or how they

have handled the effects of the study on the participants during

and after the study)

 If approval has been sought from the ethics committee

8. Was the data analysis sufficiently rigorous? Yes Can’t tell No

HINT: Consider

 If there is an in-depth description of the analysis process

 If thematic analysis is used. If so, is it clear how the

categories/themes were derived from the data?

 Whether the researcher explains how the data presented

were selected from the original sample to demonstrate

the analysis process

 If sufficient data are presented to support the findings

 To what extent contradictory data are taken into account

 Whether the researcher critically examined their own role,

potential bias and influence during analysis and selection

of data for presentation

©Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Qualitative Research Checklist 31.05.13

6

9. Is there a clear statement of findings? Yes Can’t tell No

HINT: Consider

 If the findings are explicit

 If there is adequate discussion of the evidence both for

and against the researchers arguments

 If the researcher has discussed the credibility of their

findings (e.g. triangulation, respondent validation,

more than one analyst)

 If the findings are discussed in relation to the original

research question

10. How valuable is the research?

HINT: Consider

 If the researcher discusses the contribution the study

makes to existing knowledge or understanding e.g.

do they consider the findings in relation to current

practice or policy?, or relevant research-based literature?

 If they identify new areas where research is necessary

 If the researchers have discussed whether or how the

findings can be transferred to other populations or

considered other ways the research may be used