Evidence-Based Project, Part 5: Recommending an Evidence-Based Practice Change

profilewhinny
APPRAISAL2.docx

Running head: Critical Appraisal of Research

Critical Appraisal of Research

Part 4B: Critical Appraisal of Research

Walden University: NURS-6052.

October 13, 2019

Part 4B: Critical Appraisal of Research

Given my examination, the best practice that rises out of the exploration I checked on is Evidence-Based Practice (EBP), whereby in a clinical setting, it is considered as a fundamental component for guaranteeing that patients are given quality care just as treatment services. EBP is viewed as reasonable just as meticulous use of clinical practices that depend on current evidence. Also, medical care experts, with the help of EBP, can settle on successful decisions in connection to medicinal services operations. EBP depends on various pieces of evidence that incorporate qualitative just as quantitative research, controlled preliminaries, case reports, expert opinion, and scientific standards.

In this specific case, the clinical practices dependent on EBP help with giving better care just as treatment benefits as per patient values alongside clinical aptitude (Forrest, 2008). EBP depends on evidence gathered from qualitative research. Consequently, the quantitative analysis assumes a significant role in collecting data about current practices to be effected for the improvement of clinical skills and in gathering the patient's values. The research examines that are ineffectively structured, and inadequate reporting is contended to influence quantitative analysis crosswise over various spheres that incorporate medicinal services, future research, decision making, and health policy. In such manner, distinguishing reporting rules including diagnosis test studies (STARD), observational studies (STROBE), meta-analyses of observational studies (MOOSE), consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) and randomized controlled trials (CONSORT) were used in these peer-reviewed articles.

Recognizing that clinicians have time constraints but then need to give the ideal care to their patients, the evidence-based methodology offers clinicians an advantageous technique for discovering current research to help in making clinical decisions, answer patient questions, and investigate alternative therapies, strategies, or materials. With a comprehension of how to viably use EBDM, professionals can rapidly and helpfully remain current with scientific discoveries on points that are essential to them and their patients.

References

DiBardino, D., Cohen, E. R., & Didwania, A. (2014). Meta‐analysis: multidisciplinary fall prevention strategies in the acute care inpatient population. Journal of hospital medicine7(6), 497-503.

Forrest, J. L. (2008). Evidence-based decision making: introduction and formulating good clinical questions. J Contemp Dent Pract1(3), 042-052.

Haines, T. P., Hill, K. D., Bennell, K. L., & Osborne, R. H. (2017). Additional exercise for older subacute hospital inpatients to prevent falls: benefits and barriers to implementation and evaluation. Clinical Rehabilitation21(8), 742-753.

Hempel, S., Newberry, S., Wang, Z., Booth, M., Shanman, R., Johnsen, B., & Ganz, D. A. (2017). Hospital fall prevention: a systematic review of implementation, components, adherence, and effectiveness. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society61(4), 483-494.

Spiva, L., & Hart, P. (2014). Evidence-Based Interventions for Preventing Falls in Acute Care Hospitals.