6512 Assignment Wk 4
AmblerchickName: NURS_6512_Week_4_Assignment1_Rubric
List View
|
Excellent |
Good |
Fair |
Poor |
Quality of Work Submitted: The extent of which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking. |
Points: Points Range: 27 (27%) - 30 (30%)
Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics. Feedback: |
Points: Points Range: 24 (24%) - 26 (26%)
Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics. Feedback: |
Points: Points Range: 21 (21%) - 23 (23%)
Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed. Feedback: |
Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 20 (20%)
Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed. Feedback: |
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student's ability to: Understand and interpret the assignment's key concepts. |
Points: Points Range: 27 (27%) - 30 (30%)
Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts. Feedback: |
Points: Points Range: 24 (24%) - 26 (26%)
Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts. Feedback: |
Points: Points Range: 21 (21%) - 23 (23%)
Shows some degree of understanding of key concepts. Feedback: |
Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 20 (20%)
Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics. Feedback: |
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student's ability to: Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources. |
Points: Points Range: 18 (18%) - 20 (20%)
Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 2-3 course resources to support point of view. Feedback: |
Points: Points Range: 16 (16%) - 17 (17%)
Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view. Feedback: |
Points: Points Range: 14 (14%) - 15 (15%)
Minimally includes and integrates specific information from 2-3 resources to support major points and point of view. Feedback: |
Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 13 (13%)
Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resource to support major points and point of view. Feedback: |
Written Expression and Formatting Paragraph/Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused--neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. |
Points: Points Range: 9 (9%) - 10 (10%)
Paragraphs/Sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity Feedback: |
Points: Points Range: 8 (8%) - 8 (8%)
Paragraphs/sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time. Feedback: |
Points: Points Range: 7 (7%) - 7 (7%)
Paragraphs/sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 60%- 79% of the time. Feedback: |
Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 6 (6%)
Paragraphs/sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time. Feedback: |
Written Expression and Formatting English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. |
Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Feedback: |
Points: Points Range: 3 (3%) - 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Feedback: |
Points: Points Range: 2 (2%) - 2 (2%)
Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Feedback: |
Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 1 (1%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Feedback: |
Written Expression and Formatting The assignment follows parenthetical/in-text citations, and at least 3 evidenced based references are listed. |
Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)
Contains parenthetical/in-text citations and at least 3 evidenced based references are listed. Feedback: |
Points: Points Range: 3 (3%) - 4 (4%)
Contains parenthetical/in-text citations and at least 2 evidenced based references are listed Feedback: |
Points: Points Range: 2 (2%) - 2 (2%)
Contains parenthetical/in-text citations and at least 1 evidenced based reference is listed Feedback: |
Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 1 (1%)
Contains no parenthetical/in-text citations and 0 evidenced based references listed. Feedback: |
Show Descriptions Show Feedback
Quality of Work Submitted: The extent of which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking.--
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent 27 (27%) - 30 (30%)
Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.
Good 24 (24%) - 26 (26%)
Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.
Fair 21 (21%) - 23 (23%)
Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed.
Poor 0 (0%) - 20 (20%)
Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed.
Feedback:
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student's ability to: Understand and interpret the assignment's key concepts.--
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent 27 (27%) - 30 (30%)
Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts.
Good 24 (24%) - 26 (26%)
Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts.
Fair 21 (21%) - 23 (23%)
Shows some degree of understanding of key concepts.
Poor 0 (0%) - 20 (20%)
Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics.
Feedback:
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student's ability to: Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources.--
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent 18 (18%) - 20 (20%)
Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 2-3 course resources to support point of view.
Good 16 (16%) - 17 (17%)
Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view.
Fair 14 (14%) - 15 (15%)
Minimally includes and integrates specific information from 2-3 resources to support major points and point of view.
Poor 0 (0%) - 13 (13%)
Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resource to support major points and point of view.
Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting Paragraph/Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused--neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.--
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent 9 (9%) - 10 (10%)
Paragraphs/Sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity
Good 8 (8%) - 8 (8%)
Paragraphs/sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time.
Fair 7 (7%) - 7 (7%)
Paragraphs/sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.
Poor 0 (0%) - 6 (6%)
Paragraphs/sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time.
Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.--
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
Good 3 (3%) - 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Fair 2 (2%) - 2 (2%)
Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Poor 0 (0%) - 1 (1%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting The assignment follows parenthetical/in-text citations, and at least 3 evidenced based references are listed.--
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)
Contains parenthetical/in-text citations and at least 3 evidenced based references are listed.
Good 3 (3%) - 4 (4%)
Contains parenthetical/in-text citations and at least 2 evidenced based references are listed
Fair 2 (2%) - 2 (2%)
Contains parenthetical/in-text citations and at least 1 evidenced based reference is listed
Poor 0 (0%) - 1 (1%)
Contains no parenthetical/in-text citations and 0 evidenced based references listed.
Feedback:
Total Points: 100 |
%7B%220.210000
%7B%220.000000
%7B%220.180000
%7B%220.160000
%7B%220.140000
%7B%220.090000
%7B%220.080000
%7B%220.070000
%7B%220.050000
%7B%220.270000
%7B%220.030000
%7B%220.020000
%7B%220.240000