6512 Assignment Wk 4

profileAmblerchick
6512Wk4Assignment.docx

Name: NURS_6512_Week_4_Assignment1_Rubric

List View

 

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Quality of Work Submitted: The extent of which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking.

Points:

Points Range: 27 (27%) - 30 (30%)

Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 24 (24%) - 26 (26%)

Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 21 (21%) - 23 (23%)

Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 20 (20%)

Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed.

Feedback:

Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student's ability to: Understand and interpret the assignment's key concepts.

Points:

Points Range: 27 (27%) - 30 (30%)

Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 24 (24%) - 26 (26%)

Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 21 (21%) - 23 (23%)

Shows some degree of understanding of key concepts.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 20 (20%)

Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics.

Feedback:

Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student's ability to: Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources.

Points:

Points Range: 18 (18%) - 20 (20%)

Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 2-3 course resources to support point of view.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 16 (16%) - 17 (17%)

Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 14 (14%) - 15 (15%)

Minimally includes and integrates specific information from 2-3 resources to support major points and point of view.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 13 (13%)

Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resource to support major points and point of view.

Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting Paragraph/Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused--neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.

Points:

Points Range: 9 (9%) - 10 (10%)

Paragraphs/Sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 8 (8%) - 8 (8%)

Paragraphs/sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 7 (7%) - 7 (7%)

Paragraphs/sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 6 (6%)

Paragraphs/sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time.

Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.

Points:

Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 3 (3%) - 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 2 (2%) - 2 (2%)

Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 1 (1%)

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting The assignment follows parenthetical/in-text citations, and at least 3 evidenced based references are listed.

Points:

Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)

Contains parenthetical/in-text citations and at least 3 evidenced based references are listed.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 3 (3%) - 4 (4%)

Contains parenthetical/in-text citations and at least 2 evidenced based references are listed

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 2 (2%) - 2 (2%)

Contains parenthetical/in-text citations and at least 1 evidenced based reference is listed

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 1 (1%)

Contains no parenthetical/in-text citations and 0 evidenced based references listed.

Feedback:

Show Descriptions Show Feedback

Quality of Work Submitted: The extent of which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking.--

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent 27 (27%) - 30 (30%)

Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.

Good 24 (24%) - 26 (26%)

Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.

Fair 21 (21%) - 23 (23%)

Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed.

Poor 0 (0%) - 20 (20%)

Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed.

Feedback:

Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student's ability to: Understand and interpret the assignment's key concepts.--

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent 27 (27%) - 30 (30%)

Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts.

Good 24 (24%) - 26 (26%)

Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts.

Fair 21 (21%) - 23 (23%)

Shows some degree of understanding of key concepts.

Poor 0 (0%) - 20 (20%)

Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics.

Feedback:

Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student's ability to: Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources.--

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent 18 (18%) - 20 (20%)

Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 2-3 course resources to support point of view.

Good 16 (16%) - 17 (17%)

Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view.

Fair 14 (14%) - 15 (15%)

Minimally includes and integrates specific information from 2-3 resources to support major points and point of view.

Poor 0 (0%) - 13 (13%)

Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resource to support major points and point of view.

Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting Paragraph/Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused--neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.--

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent 9 (9%) - 10 (10%)

Paragraphs/Sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity

Good 8 (8%) - 8 (8%)

Paragraphs/sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time.

Fair 7 (7%) - 7 (7%)

Paragraphs/sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.

Poor 0 (0%) - 6 (6%)

Paragraphs/sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time.

Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.--

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

Good 3 (3%) - 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Fair 2 (2%) - 2 (2%)

Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Poor 0 (0%) - 1 (1%)

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting The assignment follows parenthetical/in-text citations, and at least 3 evidenced based references are listed.--

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)

Contains parenthetical/in-text citations and at least 3 evidenced based references are listed.

Good 3 (3%) - 4 (4%)

Contains parenthetical/in-text citations and at least 2 evidenced based references are listed

Fair 2 (2%) - 2 (2%)

Contains parenthetical/in-text citations and at least 1 evidenced based reference is listed

Poor 0 (0%) - 1 (1%)

Contains no parenthetical/in-text citations and 0 evidenced based references listed.

Feedback:

Total Points: 100

%7B%220.210000

%7B%220.000000

%7B%220.180000

%7B%220.160000

%7B%220.140000

%7B%220.090000

%7B%220.080000

%7B%220.070000

%7B%220.050000

%7B%220.270000

%7B%220.030000

%7B%220.020000

%7B%220.240000