Quality of Work Submitted: The extent of which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking.--
Excellent 27 (27%) - 30 (30%)
Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.
Good 24 (24%) - 26 (26%)
Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.
Fair 21 (21%) - 23 (23%)
Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed.
Poor 0 (0%) - 20 (20%)
Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed.
Quality of Work Submitted: The purpose of the paper is clear.--
Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria.
Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%)
Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
Fair 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)
Purpose of the assignment is vague or off topic.
Poor 0 (0%) - 3 (3%)
No purpose statement was provided.
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extend to which the work reflects the student's ability to: Understand and interpret the assignment's key concepts.--
Excellent 9 (9%) - 10 (10%)
Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts.
Good 8 (8%) - 8 (8%)
Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts.
Fair 7 (7%) - 7 (7%)
Shows some degree of understanding of key concepts.
Poor 0 (0%) - 6 (6%)
Shows a lack of …