Who 's into health care?
Identify a contemporary health care issue and write a paper of 750-1,000 words that describes how the issue affects the organization from a business perspective. Apply the following questions to generate your conclusions about how you would proceed:
1. Will there be differences between how for-profit organizations (versus not-for-profit organizations) are impacted?
2. What are the perspectives and responsibilities of the financial management staff?
3. What are the basic rules and regulations of the issue that the financial management of the organization must address?
Cite a minimum of three references to support your rationale.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide.
Analysis of Contemporary Health Care Issue
40.0 %Apply the Issues of Profit vs. Not-for-Profit, Perspectives and Responsibilities, and Rules and Regulations to the Chosen Health Care Issue
Does not demonstrate an understanding of the business concepts involved in the issue, including the implications. Does not address the three requirements specified in the assignment. Does not demonstrate critical thinking and analysis of the situation, and does not develop effective answers to the questions, with rationale.
Demonstrates only minimal understanding of the business concepts involved in the issue. Only minimally addresses the three requirements specified in the assignment. Demonstrates only minimal abilities for critical thinking and analysis of the case study, and develops weak answers to the questions, with minimal rationale
Demonstrates knowledge of the business concepts involved in the issue, but has some slight misunderstanding of the implications. Satisfactorily addresses only one of the three requirements specified in the assignment. Provides a basic idea of critical thinking and analysis for the questions, answers, and rationale.
Demonstrates acceptable knowledge of the business concepts involved in the issue. Satisfactorily addresses only two of the three requirements specified in the assignments. Develops an acceptable response and rationale for it. Utilizes some examples.
Demonstrates thorough knowledge of the business concepts involved in the issue, and their implications. Satisfactorily addresses all three of requirements specified in the assignments. Clearly answers the questions and develops a very strong rationale. Introduces appropriate examples.
30.0 %Integrates Information from Outside Resources into the Body of Paper
Does not use references, examples, or explanations.
Provides some supporting examples, but minimal explanations and no published references.
Supports main points with examples and explanations, but fails to include published references to support claims and ideas.
Supports main points with references, explanations, and examples. Application and description is direct, competent, and appropriate of the criteria.
Supports main points with references, examples, and full explanations of how they apply.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague. Purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Lacks sufficient justification of claims. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
All format elements are correct.
5.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style)
No reference page is included. No citations are used.
Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.
Reference page lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present
Reference page is inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.
In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
- class discussion
- Do you feel the unconventional methods of terrorist groups are effective? Explain your answer.
- Write my Essays Please With NO PLAGIARISM!!!!!
- Communication Mini Paper
- ntroduction to Information Systems Security Physical Security Paper
- A+ Answers
- POST FOR HANDSHAKE
- revision of the capstone
- Week 1 database.
Assessing a Research Study Article.( In Healthcare Quality) Due by Oct 14, 2014 3pm Central time. Write 780 words that analyzes and summarizes your findings.
Identify an article that …
500 need in 4 hours Must be 100% original
Respond to each of the following questions (150-200 words each) that apply the economic concepts described in this topic's assigned readings inThe Economics of Health and Medical Care.6th …
Respond to each of the following questions in 150-200 words, each covering the economic topics and concepts described in this topic's assigned readings inThe Economics of Health and Medical …
Need help with essay only not the chart.
You are the manager of a variable hospital department, and you just received your monthly budget results that state that your salaries were higher and your supplies were lower than budgeted. Your …
Select a provider or health care facility coder/biller to interview and review the process they go through to satisfy reimbursement requirements for billing purposes.
Write a paper of 750 words that …
PLEASE FOLLOW THE RUBRIC
Write a paper of 750-1,000 words that describes the processes that are utilized in producing a final bill. Include in the paper:
- 1.How health care charging and pricing …