Sam Harris argues that the problem of accounting for the existence and apparent random distribution of pain, and suffering – and evil more generally – is intractable for a religion which proposes a God who is omniscient, omnipotent, and perfectly benefice

profileohernzebagks

450 words due by 3 p.m Eastern Standard Time. No outside work just work from Sam Harris The End of Belief, "The Science of Good and Evil"

 

This is the full question:

Sam Harris argues that the problem of accounting for the existence and apparent random distribution of pain, and suffering – and evil more generally – is intractable for a religion which proposes a God who is omniscient, omnipotent, and perfectly beneficent. On the other hand, that is supposed to be perfectly intelligible within a scientific framework. How is that supposed to work?

    • 7 years ago
    • 10
    Answer(1)

    Purchase the answer to view it

    blurred-text
    NOT RATED
    • attachment
      order_64235_153879.doc