Please put the following argument in standard logical form:" If either the premises are inconsistent or the conclusion is a tautology, then the argument is valid. If an argument is invalid, then it has consistent premises. The premises are inconsistent only if the conclusion is not a tautology. An argument is invalid if the conclusion is not a tautology. If the premises are consistent, then the argument is invalid. Therefore, if an argument is valid, then it has inconsistent premises." Evaluate the argument by explaining in terms of a full truth table as well and need to answer these: "If the conclusion is logically equivalent to a premise, can the argument be invalid (explain in terms of a truth table that consists of only the last premise and the conclusion)? Is the argument sound? Explain why each premise and the conclusion is true or false."

Purchase the answer to view it

Please put the following argument in standard logical form:" If either the premises are inconsistent or the conclusion is a tautology, then the argument is valid. If an argument is invalid, then it …