Exemplary_Professor001
Psygirl76Singer argues that there is no moral justification for denying moral consideration to animals. Can you think of a reason why our moral consideration should include all humans regardless of their level of cognitive ability, yet denied to non-human animals simply because they have lower levels of cognitive abilities (though still higher in some cases than those of human infants and some mentally disabled humans)? What response might he have to your way of drawing the line between the types of beings that should get moral consideration and those that should not?
- 8 years ago
- 20
Answer(0)
Bids(0)
other Questions(10)
- The following questions need to be answered in 200 to 300 words per question. 1. Assess the similarities and difference between...
- ECON 214 PROBLEM SET 1 Question 3
- Research
- Data and information
- Marketing homework help
- ACC 571 Week 4 WileyPLUS Assignment
- essay form with a minimum of 500 words in APA format.
- US cigarette sales between 1955 and 1985
- BUS 308 Week 1 Quiz
- BUS 308 Discussion 2 Due by 11pm 7/10/2014