English Paper
john1183
5-6 Assignment 2, Milestone 1: Draft
See the rubric.
Do not cut and paste large sections of Wikipedia pages together to create a paper. This is plagiarism. Please aquatint yourself with the consequences thereof. You need to remove all Wikipedia material from this paper, create a central argument that you can defend and support, and use databases from the library to find peer-reviewed resources. Use the “Ask a librarian” feature for help with research and submit to the online writing center for help with organization and proofreading. Do not surf the internet or use Wikipedia under any circumstances.
Proficient | Needs Improvement | Not Evident | |
---|---|---|---|
Introduction: Overview | Points: 13.5 (10%) Provides an overview of the issue being analyzed and briefly describes main points of argument | Points: 10.13 (7.5%) Provides an overview of the issue being analyzed and briefly describes main points of argument but contains issues regarding accuracy Feedback: This should be a persuasive paper, not an informative paper on the state of road planning and construction | Points: 0 (0%) Does not provide an overview of the issue being analyzed |
Introduction: Thesis | Points: 13.5 (10%) Composes a thesis that states the argument that will be supported and proven throughout the essay | Points: 10.13 (7.5%) Composes a thesis but contains issues related to clarity or relevancy | Points: 0 (0%) Does not compose a thesis Feedback: There doesn't seem to be an arguable thesis. |
Body: Intent | Points: 13.5 (10%) Writes multiple paragraphs that are focused, clearly state their intent, and build the thesis argument | Points: 10.13 (7.5%) Writes multiple paragraphs but writing does not build the thesis argument Feedback: Very few of the paragraphs are your own--most of this paper is a direct cut and paste from various and uncredited Wikipedia sites. This constitutes plagiarism. Please see the announcement at the beginning of the course concerning plagiarism and the consequences thereof. | Points: 0 (0%) Does not write multiple paragraphs |
Body: Body Paragraphs | Points: 40.5 (30%) Body paragraphs communicate argument by combining thoughts and ideas with evidence | Points: 30.38 (22.5%) Body paragraphs communicate argument but do not combine thoughts and ideas with evidence Feedback: There are a few credited sources used throughout, though they aren't clearly connected to any argument. See the following for ways to compile a persuasive essay: | Points: 0 (0%) Does not communicate argument through body paragraphs |
Body: Opposing Viewpoints | Points: 13.5 (10%) Addresses and refutes opposing viewpoints in a way that strengthens the argument | Points: 10.13 (7.5%) Addresses and refutes opposing viewpoints but not in a way that strengthens the argument Feedback: These really aren't counterarguments to any specific argument built within the paper, though there are some sources credited. | Points: 0 (0%) Does not address or refute opposing viewpoints |
Conclusion: Review | Points: 13.5 (10%) Reviews claim and summarizes key supporting points of essay | Points: 10.13 (7.5%) Reviews claim and summarizes key supporting points but contains issues regarding alignment to the intent of the thesis | Points: 0 (0%) Does not review claim Feedback: Adding several more paragraphs from Wikipedia doesn't constitute a summation of your main points. |
Conclusion: Insights | Points: 13.5 (10%) Articulates insights about argument established through the analysis, following argument logically, referring to key points or quotes used to support argument | Points: 10.13 (7.5%) Articulates insights about argument established through the essay, but does not follow argument logically or does not refer to key points or quotes used to support claim | Points: 0 (0%) Does not articulate insights about argument Feedback: There needs to be insight to the argument given here as well as an emphasis on concluding evidence. |
Articulation of Response | Points: 13.5 (10%) Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization | Points: 10.13 (7.5%) Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas Feedback: Format according to APA standards. You need to proofread the text that is your own for usage (their/there), fragments, and agreement. | Points: 0 (0%) Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas |
Raw Total: 70.88 (of 135.0)
Feedback to Learner
- 7 years ago
- 5
Answer(1)
Purchase the answer to view it
NOT RATED
- order_49054_118325.doc
Bids(1)