Case Study # 1 - Patient Autonomy. Using what we discussed in class, your textbook and outside sources, please provide your thoughts and answers to the questions attached to the two case studies listed below. Where applicable, please include a discussion

profileDr Ava_Mia
 (Not rated)
 (Not rated)
Chat

Case Study # 1 - Patient Autonomy.
Using what we discussed in class, your textbook and outside sources, please provide your thoughts and answers to the questions attached to the two case studies listed below. Where applicable, please include a discussion for the basis/ rationale for your answer.
Submit it to the DropBox Located in Week 4.

Autonomy

 

Autonomy essentially means "self rule," and it is a patient's most basic right. As such, it is a health care worker's responsibility to respect the autonomy of her patients. However, at times this can be difficult because it can conflict with the paternalistic attitude of many health care professionals. The following two cases address patient autonomy. The first involves the rights of an individual to decide her own fate, even against her physicians' judgments. The second case involves the rights of a parent to care for her child in the manner that she sees fit.

 

Case 1:

 

A woman enters the emergency room with stomach pain. She undergoes a CT scan and is diagnosed with an abdominal aortic aneurysm, a weakening in the wall of the aorta which causes it to stretch and bulge (this is very similar to what led to John Ritter's death). The physicians inform her that the only way to fix the problem is surgically, and that the chances of survival are about 50/50. They also inform her that time is of the essence, and that should the aneurysm burst, she would be dead in a few short minutes. The woman is an erotic dancer; she worries that the surgery will leave a scar that will negatively affect her work; therefore, she refuses any surgical treatment. Even after much pressuring from the physicians, she adamantly refuses surgery. Feeling that the woman is not in her correct state of mind and knowing that time is of the essence, the surgeons decide to perform the procedure without consent. They anesthetize her and surgically repair the aneurysm. She survives, and sues the hospital for millions of dollars.

Questions for Case 1:

 

  • Do you believe that the physician's actions can be justified in any way?
  • Is there anything else that they could have done?
  • Is it ever right to take away someone's autonomy? (Would a court order make the physicians' decisions ethical?)
  • What would you do if you were one of the health care workers?

 

Case 2:

 

You are a general practitioner and a mother comes into your office with her child who is complaining of flu-like symptoms. Upon entering the room, you ask the boy to remove his shirt and you notice a pattern of very distinct bruises on the boy's torso. You ask the mother where the bruises came from, and she tells you that they are from a procedure she performed on him known as "cao gio," which is also known as "coining." The procedure involves rubbing warm oils or gels on a person's skin with a coin or other flat metal object. The mother explains that cao gio is used to raise out bad blood, and improve circulation and healing. When you touch the boy's back with your stethoscope, he winces in pain from the bruises. You debate whether or not you should call Child Protective Services and report the mother.

 

Questions for Case 2:

 

  • Should we completely discount this treatment as useless, or could there be something gained from it?
  • When should a physician step in to stop a cultural practice? (If someone answers "when it harms the child" remind that person that there is some pain in many of our medical procedures, for example, having one's tonsils removed)
  • Should the physician be concerned about alienating the mother and other people of her ethnicity from modern medicine?
  • Do you think that the physician should report the mother?

 

    • 8 years ago
    A++ Answer
    NOT RATED

    Purchase the answer to view it

    blurred-text
    • attachment
      patients_autonomy.docx