Can you help me with my paper?

profilewritersblock

Paper #2: (20 percent)

In this assessment, students will read the case study provided.  Students will then write a paper analyzing the situation with the daughter and father in terms of the following required elements:  The expectation is that the analysis is thorough and detailed yet concise.  Be sure to make connections between the facts presented in the case study and the information on leadership in the course readings.   Students are expected to effectively use a wide range of the course readings in completing the paper, which means the course readings are used to support ideas and reasoning rather than stand-alone statements.  In writing this paper, it is necessary to perform an analysis in terms of how and why the daughter or father take a certain course of action.  Students are not covering the topics superficially but are required to use the course readings to explain the detail:

 

 

 

  • Leadership role
  • Leader as individual
  • Social architect
  • Change agent

 

  • Ø  Include father as a manager with short-term goal orientation
  • Ø  Include daughter as a leader with long-term goal orientation

 

  • Relationship builder
  • How can the daughter and father use the concept of moral compass to give direction to the implementation of a vision and contribute to the success and sustainability of the company?

 

Required Formatting of the Paper #2:

 

  • This report should be double spaced, 12-point font, and five to seven pages in length excluding the title page and reference page;
  • Include an introduction and a summary paragraph;
  • Title page with your name, the course name, the date, and instructor’s name;
  • Use headings;
  • Writing should be clear and concise;
  • Write in the third person;
  • Use APA formatting for in-text citations and reference page.  You are expected to paraphrase and not use direct quotes. Deductions will be taken when direct quotes are used and found to be unnecessary;
  • Outside resources may be used but the majority of the support will come from the course readings with a wide array of readings used;
  • Submit the paper in the Assignment Folder.

Websites to use in the paper:

 

References:

http://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/leadership/leadership-functions/build-sustain-relationships/main

 

http://www.bizjournals.com/bizjournals/how-to/human-resources/2013/04/how-to-inspire-your-employees-to-make.html?page=all

 

http://www.kenblanchard.com/img/pub/Blanchard-Building-Trust.pdf

 

http://www.transformleaders.tv/how-to-influence-others-powerfully/

 

http://www.lesaffaires.com/uploads/references/743_why-should-anyone-be-led-by-you_Goffee_Jones.pdf

 

http://www.forbes.com/sites/ekaterinawalter/2013/10/08/5-myths-of-leadership/

 

http://www.forbes.com/sites/augustturak/2012/07/17/the-11-leadership-secrets-you-never-heard-about/2/

 

http://www.gallup.com/businessjournal/113542/What-Followers-Want-From-Leaders.aspx

 

http://iveybusinessjournal.com/topics/leadership/the-allure-of-toxic-leaders-why-followers-rarely-escape-their-clutches#.VFGzt1fislE

 

http://www.gitomer.com/articles/ViewPublicArticle.html?key=ajcdMibak3OVg%2fn5Q%2fj8Jg%3d%3d

 

http://dmcodyssey.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/8.-Leadership-Power-and-Influence.pdf

 

https://www.youtube.com/user/BlessingWhite?v=gZ3wxgog4nc

 

Rubric Name: Written Assignment (20%)

 
      
Criteria

demonstrates a high degree of critical thinking, is consistent in accurately interpreting questions & material; provides solid assumptions, reasoning & claims; provides thorough analysis & evaluation with sound conclusions

shows good critical thinking; accurately interprets most questions & material; usually identifies relevant arguments/reasoning/claims; offers good analysis & evaluation with fairly sound conclusions

shows occasional critical thinking; questions & material is at times accurately interpreted; arguments/reasoning/claims are occasionally explained; offers fair analysis & evaluation with a conclusion

shows little critical thinking, misinterprets questions or material; ignores or superficially evaluates; justifies little and seldom explains reasoning; draws unwarranted conclusions

lacks critical thinking consistently offers biased interpretations; ignores or superficially evaluates; argues using poor reasoning, and/or unwarranted claims

arguments or positions are well-supported with evidence from the readings/experience; ideas go beyond the course material and recognize implications and extensions of the material and concepts

arguments or positions are mostly supported by evidence from the readings and course content; ideas presented demonstrate student’s understanding of the material and concepts

arguments are more often based on opinion or unclear views than on position grounded in the readings of material or external sources of material

arguments are frequently illogical and unsubstantiated; student may resort to ad hominem attacks on the author instead of making meaningful application of the material

arguments lack meaningful explanation or support of ideas

demonstrated full understanding of requirements; responded to each aspect of assignment

demonstrated understanding of requirements; missed one minor aspect of assignment

demonstrated some understanding of requirements; missed a key element or two minor aspects of assignment

failed to show a firm understanding of requirements; missed two key elements or several minor aspects of assignment

did not demonstrate understanding of assignment requirements

writing is clear and easy to follow; grammar and spelling are all correct; formatting gives a professional look and adds to readability

most ideas are presented clearly; occasional spelling and/or grammar issues

wordy; some points require rereading to understand fully; more than an occasional spelling and/or grammar

unclear and difficult to understand; frequent spelling and grammar issues

largely incomprehensible writing/poorly written in terms of mechanics and structure

no APA style errors

attempts in-text citation and reference list but 1 or 2 APA style errors are present

attempts in-text citation and reference list; APA style errors are present; inconsistencies in citation usage can be found throughout the document

attempts either in-text citation or reference list but omits the other

no attempt at APA style

Overall Score
      

 

 

 

  • 6 years ago
  • 1
Answer(0)
Bids(0)