Organizer- changed due date
lsutigers27Create a graphic organizer listing and defining the five research-based elements of reading. Be sure to include corresponding activities and assessments for each element.
Write an essay of 1,000-1,250 words outlining five to seven techniques to teach phonics and promote phonemic awareness.
1. Define phonics and phonemic awareness, and explain their importance in learning to read.
2. Include differentiated strategies for ELLs, special needs, and gifted students.
3. Include an assessment for each differentiated strategy.
4. Name any manipulatives or cooperative-group activities used.
5. What actions would you take for a student who may not demonstrate progress?
Minimum of three to five peer-reviewed articles that can be used in support of your content.
Rubic
Phonics and Phonemic Awareness
|
1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% |
2 Less Than Satisfactory 65.00% |
3 Satisfactory 75.00% |
4 Good 85.00% |
5 Excellent 100.00% |
|
70.0 %Content |
|
|||||
30.0 % Graphic Organizer |
Graphic organizer does not contain the five elements of reading, activities, or assessments. |
Graphic organizer is incomplete, and is missing some elements contained in the five elements of reading, activities, or assessments. |
Graphic organizer is complete, and contains the five elements of reading and corresponding activities with assessments. |
Graphic organizer is complete, clear, and coherent. Contains the five elements of reading and corresponding activities with assessments. |
Graphic organizer is complete, clear, and coherent. Contains the five elements of reading and corresponding activities with assessments. Demonstrates higher-order thinking. |
|
40.0 % Essay |
Essay is incomplete and omits most of the requirements stated in the assignment's criteria. Major points are irrelevant to the assignment. No outside sources are used to support major points. Fewer than three techniques are provided. |
Essay is incomplete or omits some requirements stated in the assignment's criteria. Major points are not clear or persuasive. No outside sources are used to support major points. Three to four techniques are provided. |
Essay is complete. Research is evident. Major points are addressed but are not well supported by outside sources. Five to seven techniques are provided. |
Essay is comprehensive and accurate. Definitions are clearly stated. Major points are stated clearly and are supported. Research is adequate, timely, relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment's criteria. At least two relevant academic sources were cited. Six to seven techniques are provided. |
Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive. Definitions are clearly stated. Major points are stated clearly and are well-supported. Research is adequate, timely, relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment's criteria. Three or more relevant academic sources were cited. More than seven techniques are provided. |
|
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness |
|
|||||
7.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose |
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. |
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. |
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. |
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. |
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
|
8.0 % Argument Logic and Construction |
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. |
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. |
Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument supports the purpose logically but not thoroughly. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. |
Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. |
Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
|
5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) |
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. |
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. |
Some mechanical errors or typos are present but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. |
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. |
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
|
10.0 %Format |
|
|||||
5.0 % Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) |
Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. |
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. |
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. |
Appropriate template is used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. |
All format elements are correct. |
|
5.0 % Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) |
No reference page is included. No citations are used. |
Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. |
Reference page lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. |
Reference page is inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. |
In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. |
|
100 % Total Weightage |
|
|