1 page essay

profileMr.Q

5 points: posting  your own discussion 
5 points: replying to the discussion of 1 other student in the class

---------------------------

In this area construct an argument for or against the view that privacy protection should be improved for ordinary users who conduct searches on Google.  Next evaluate your arguments against the rules for valid, inductive, and fallacious arguments.  Does your argument contain any of the informal fallacies examined in the chapter.

 

response to this.....

Premise 1: We do not have to use Google, there are many other search engines to use besides Google they are just as good.

Premise 2: Knowing that you do not have to use Google if you have a suspicious feeling that your privacy is not protected then you can simply switch to other search engines that might not have this problem.

Conclusion: Your risk of information on the internet is always a risk if you put private information on the internet. You cannot blame just one search engine because its job is to search the World Wide Web.

This could be valid but an unsound argument because I believe that the premise assumed to be true it can't be proven that other GOogle search engines are just as good as this one because most people use Google. I think this argument has logical fallacies because they have the possibilities to be true but i do not have the information to prove that as valid.

  • 10 years ago
  • 5
Answer(1)

Purchase the answer to view it

blurred-text
NOT RATED
  • attachment
    google_users.docx
Bids(1)